Abstract
Integrating world models into Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) has emerged as a promising direction, enabling policies to anticipate future dynamics beyond reactive observation-to-action mapping. However, existing approaches vary simultaneously in their world representations, integration paradigms, and policy backbones, making it difficult to determine what truly matters for effective world model integration. To disentangle these factors, we categorize existing efforts into four representative paradigms, namely Implicit Future Alignment, Explicit Future Query, MoT Future Expert, and External World Predictor. We instantiate each within a unified framework and systematically evaluate these paradigms with diverse world representations and policy backbones across in-domain, out-of-domain, long-horizon, dynamic, few-shot, and real-world settings. Our study yields four main findings: 1) world representation effectiveness is paradigm-dependent, whereas 2D semantic representations offer robust, cross-paradigm gains; 2) no single paradigm is universally optimal, yet the decoupled MoT Future Expert offers competitive overall performance, particularly in OOD robustness; 3) world modeling consistently benefits policies built on standard VLMs, while decoupled designs exhibit greater compatibility with pretrained VLAs; and 4) world modeling improves performance over action-only baselines across multiple settings, with notable gains on long-horizon and dynamic tasks. Project page and video demonstrations are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19825
