Abstract
In Theory-of-Mind (ToM) reasoning, large language models may correctly infer the agent's mental state but fail to use that inference when predicting or judging the agent's subsequent actions. In this work, we investigate whether explicitly connecting perception, belief, and action with rules improves ToM reasoning. We generate concise \textit{if--then} rules that express relations between perception to action and use Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to train Qwen2.5 and Llama3 models across four ToM benchmarks. GRPO with rule generation outperforms prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and think reasoning. Moreover, rules generated by larger models ($\geq$3B) provide transferable knowledge that improves downstream performance of GPT-4o-mini. These findings suggest that explicit rules help models bridge the reasoning gap in ToM and support knowledge transfer across models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19796
