Abstract
Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embeddings or hidden states, enabling richer intermediate representations and preserving alternative reasoning paths. However, the need for latent reasoning varies across decoding steps: confident predictions favor discrete commitment, whereas ambiguous steps benefit from preserving multiple plausible alternatives. Existing approaches typically handle this variation through either global soft activation or hard switching based on uncertainty thresholds, treating latent intervention as an all-or-nothing decision rather than continuously adapting its strength. To address this limitation, we propose Competitive Token Selection (CoTS), a training-free framework that reframes latent intervention from binary mode selection into continuous allocation at the token level. CoTS uses the probability competition between the two most likely candidates to dynamically balance discrete commitment and soft exploration at each reasoning step. The second candidate represents the strongest alternative to the model's preferred continuation, so the separation between the two directly reflects the stability of the current discrete choice. When one candidate clearly dominates, CoTS keeps the representation close to the sampled discrete token to preserve a stable reasoning trajectory; as the competition strengthens, it increases the contribution of the soft representation to retain plausible alternatives. This competition-based allocation requires neither manually tuned switching thresholds nor mixing coefficients, and introduces no additional forward passes. Experiments across six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that CoTS consistently outperforms standard CoT and state-of-the-art training-free latent reasoning methods. Our code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20642
