Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to interpret religious, educational, and culturally sensitive visual content, yet their reliability on citation verification remains underexplored. We introduce Visual Sanad, a controlled benchmark for testing whether VLMs falsely accept incorrect Qur'anic verse attributions when the same quote-reference pair is rendered under different visual framings. The benchmark contains 2,400 rendered images built from 100 English Qur'an verses, four factual states per verse, and six visual conditions ranging from plain text to decorative and authority-framed layouts. All quote-reference pairs were source-checked and human-audited before rendering. Across 24 full model-prompt runs, we observe a sharp capability split. Proprietary API-served VLMs range from near-perfect citation verification to moderate false acceptance, whereas recent open-weight VLMs often show weak discrimination and default to VALID on most images. De-biased prompting can reduce false acceptance, but often by shifting the decision threshold toward INVALID rather than by producing strong citation discrimination. Visual Sanad therefore exposes a culturally grounded multimodal factuality failure: fluent VLMs may treat displayed religious citations as self-authenticating unless they have strong citation-verification ability.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22009
