Paper Reading AI Learner

Pathology foundation models for training-free case retrieval in salivary gland tumors

2026-10-15 15:40:48
Maximilian J. Roesel, Niklas Kiermeyer, Philipp Keyl, Frederick Klauschen

Abstract

In pathology, pattern recognition relies on a frame of reference built through extensive training and experience, which may still fall short when encountering rare cancer subtypes. Archives of previously diagnosed tumors often contain relevant precedents, yet identifying the most relevant cases remains challenging. Here we explore whether content-based retrieval with current pathology foundation models facilitates rare cancer diagnostics without any task-specific training. Pathologists can query a digitized archive using a region of interest (ROI) from a whole slide image (WSI) and retrieve morphologically similar cases, along with their ICD-O codes and corresponding WSIs. The ROI can be selected manually or automatically using a gated attention-based multiple instance learning model. We evaluate our approach by leave-one-case-out on an imbalanced dataset of 137 salivary gland tumor cases spanning 12 ICD-O morphology categories, comparing four pathology foundation models (Atlas2, Atlas2-B, Atlas2-S, and UNI2h). Top-1/3/5 retrieval was 62.5%/76.7%/81.3% for Atlas2, 50.2/66.6/72.9% for UNI2h, 52.3%/71.5%/77.6% for Atlas2-B and 54.4/65.2/73.7% for Atlas2-S. Macro-averaged F1 ranged from 69.0% for the smallest model Atlas2-S to 76.6% for the largest model Atlas2 across the five classes with at least ten cases. Our modified Chamfer similarity separated correct from incorrect matches among the Top-5 more reliably for Atlas2 (AUC 0.754) than for Atlas2-B (0.679, p = 0.020) and Atlas2-S (0.653, p = 0.003), but not UNI2h (0.697, p = 0.196). Requiring no additional training or manual annotation, this approach makes departmental archives searchable with pathology foundation models, providing a low-barrier route to case-based differential diagnosis and extending the individual frame of reference to the collective experience of the department.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22087

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.22087.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot