Paper Reading AI Learner

Perceptual Comparisons of Viscoelastic Renderings: Fractional- vs Integer-Order Models

2026-10-15 14:24:41
Gorkem Gemalmaz, Harun Tolasa, Volkan Patoglu

Abstract

Realistic haptic rendering of viscoelastic materials requires reproducing time-dependent behaviors such as creep and stress relaxation, which arise from the material's inherent memory effects. Fractional-order viscoelastic models have been shown to capture these dynamics accurately and compactly, but it remains unclear whether their increased fidelity translates into perceptual benefits during haptic interaction. In this work, we investigate whether users perceive fractional-order models as more realistic than conventional integer-order models while rendering viscoelastic materials. We compare the fractional-order standard linear solid (FO-SLS) model with two integer-order alternatives: the 3-parameter SLS model and the 5-parameter generalized Maxwell model. We consider two complementary approaches to optimal parameter selection to evaluate rendering realism from both objective and perceptual perspectives: In the first approach, we determine the model parameters via least-squares based system identification of physical viscoelastic reference materials to establish evaluation baselines. In the second approach, we determine population-level perceptually optimal parameters using a qualitative-feedback-based human-in-the-loop optimization and aggregation method. This method establishes model parameters that maximize perceived realism of viscoelastic behaviors through qualitative evaluations. Human-subject experiments indicate that the FO-SLS model is perceived as significantly more realistic than both integer-order alternatives under both parameter selection approaches. Overall, this study provides experimental evidence that fractional-order viscoelastic models are not only theoretically well-motivated, but also perceptually relevant for realistic haptic rendering of creep- and relaxation-dominated behaviors of viscoelastic materials.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21965

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.21965.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot