Retrieval-based factuality evaluation, where LLM-generated claims are verified against evidence from authoritative medical corpora, has become the dominant paradigm for scalable hallucination detection in high-stakes clinical settings. Despite the urgency of reliable and transparent medical fact verification, most systems measure performance with aggregate metrics like F1, which obscure where and why failures occur. Existing RAG diagnostics require gold answers or annotated gold evidence, neither of which exists in this regime. We introduce two comprehensive taxonomies, grounded in a case study on the open-ended MedExpert dataset and 3 closed-ended datasets, decomposing failures into retrieval-stage errors along five quality dimensions, and verifier-reasoning errors into six consecutive steps. We adapt an automatic pattern induction pipeline using LLM-as-Judge to label evidence quality and classify verifier reasoning errors at scale, and then stress-test our findings across 4 retrieval methods and 6 frontier verifier models. Our analysis reveals that scaling model size, adding reasoning effort, expanding to authoritative web sources, and applying medical fine-tuning do not resolve these failure modes, demonstrating that they represent fundamental limitations of the retrieve-then-verify paradigm in open-ended medical settings rather than artifacts of outdated systems. We release our code and data at this https URL for the full reproducibility of our results.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30467
Multimodal misinformation is increasingly crafted to look convincing by pairing a textual claim with an image that appears to "prove" it. Yet in practice, building effective detectors often hinges on a small set of design choices that are rarely examined in a controlled way. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale study of multimodal design choices for misinformation detection with over 3,375 experiments- spanning three benchmark datasets and a broad range of pre-trained vision and language backbones. Through systematic comparisons and targeted robustness analyses, we distill practical guidance on which design choices help, when do they fail silently, and what aspects of the pipeline most strongly shape model behavior, answering 4 key Research Questions (RQs). We aim to provide a reliable foundation for designing stronger and more dependable multimodal misinformation detection systems, thus contributing to the broader research community.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30402
Real-time tiny object detection in aerial imagery is constrained by the weak spatial evidence of very small objects and the loss of high-resolution detail in lightweight detectors. This study presents Cross-Scale Channel-wise Knowledge Distillation (CSCWD), a training-time framework that transfers high-resolution spatial representations from a YOLO11m-P2 teacher to a compact YOLO11n student without altering the student's inference architecture. Unlike conventional same-scale feature distillation, CSCWD transfers supervision from teacher P2 to student P3 after feature alignment while retaining same-scale distillation at deeper pyramid levels. Under the unified seven-sequence Drone-vs-Bird validation protocol, YOLO11n-CSCWD achieves 50.17% mean average precision at an intersection-over-union threshold of 0.5 (mAP@0.5) and 59.73% recall, improving the matched CA-YOLO11n baseline by 2.92 percentage points in mAP@0.5 and 3.55 points in recall. Cross-scale alignment further increases mAP@0.5 by 2.09 points over the corresponding same-scale channel-wise distillation configuration. In zero-shot evaluation on DUT-Anti-UAV, mAP@0.5 increases from 48.29% to 50.06% without target-domain fine-tuning. This domain was included because its challenging small targets make low-latency, computationally efficient detection particularly relevant. On Raspberry Pi 5 using NCNN-FP16 at 640x640 resolution, the 2.58-million-parameter student achieves 50.32% mAP@0.5 at 82.32 ms mean wall-clock latency, or 12.15 frames per second, while retaining essentially the same runtime and memory requirements as the matched baseline. The results support cross-scale distillation for improving tiny-target detection without increasing inference-time model complexity.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30395
Conspiratorial discourse on social media is not always expressed through explicit claims or stable lexical markers. The same surface content may express endorsement, legitimate concerns, criticism, satire, or mockery. The main challenge is therefore not only recognizing conspiracy-related claims, but inferring the speaker's intent -- the utterance's illocutionary force. We argue that this can be achieved through the use of relevant social contexts and propose an agentic framework, equipped with a set of tools supporting social queries. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach on a unique dataset of Hebrew tweets, covering 80\%--90\% of the public Hebrew tweets published over a four-year span (late 2018-- early 2023), encompassing several election cycles as well as the COVID pandemic years and related vaccination campaigns. This extensive coverage can be used in recovering different social contexts. Evaluating our framework on a manually-annotated adversarial dataset, we find that context-aware workflows consistently outperform text-only classification and that the agentic framework performs significantly better than other frameworks and settings, including a non-agentic model exposed to the same contexts available to the agent. We further provide an analysis of the results, the errors and efficiency (token economy) tradeoffs. These findings support viewing the task of conspiracy detection as a socially embedded interpretation task, in which effective classification depends not only on access to contexts, but also on adaptive reasoning in which the agent uses tools on a per-case basis, asking only for evidence relevant to its current reasoning step.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30250
Online misinformation increasingly appears in spoken formats such as news clips, podcasts, interviews, political speeches, and social media videos, creating a need for fact-checking systems that can verify claims directly from speech. We introduce VeriSpeak, a probe benchmark for studying speech-based fact verification in Large Audio Language Models (LALMs). VeriSpeak contains 3,879 spoken claims spanning temporal, geographical, and relational facts, with balanced true and false labels. The benchmark is designed to examine whether factual verification ability transfers from text to speech, and whether retrieval-augmented LALMs can use textual evidence to correctly support or refute spoken claims. Our experiments reveal a consistent text-speech modality gap: LALMs that verify written claims reliably often fail on the same claims when spoken. Moreover, retrieval alone provides limited gains because models frequently conflate retrieved evidence with the spoken claim. In contrast, retrieval combined with explicit reasoning improves claim-evidence comparison, with a thinking-tuned LALM reaching 86.1% accuracy. VeriSpeak highlights that effective speech misinformation detection requires not only speech understanding, but also grounded reasoning over retrieved evidence. The dataset is publicly available via Hugging Face at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30227
Smartphone cameras and computer vision (CV) hold significant promise in assisting public agencies with enforcing traffic laws and enhancing road safety. This work designs and tests a smartphone-based method for automated speed estimation and vehicle identification (license plate, make/model, and color recognition) via an automated pipeline to assist enforcement agencies in reliably identifying speeders. The CV code accurately recognizes nearly half (46%) of the license plates' text on 1,800 images from a Brazil open-source dataset, called UFPR-ALPR. Code tests on daytime recordings from hand-held smartphone videos (n = 73) and roadside cameras (n = 42) in Austin, Texas yield 60.8% accuracy for color detection (among all possible RGB color categories), 48.6% on vehicle make/manufacturer identification, and 16.89% on vehicle make and model identification. Prediction accuracy for speed estimation (within a 20% range), vehicle make (within the top 3 predictions), and license plate recognition (within the top 10 predictions) are 16.3%, 16.9%, and 29.7%, respectively. This paper also illuminates the legal, technological, and practical aspects of using smartphones for enforcement, including the potential use of recordings for enforcement purposes, emphasizing the need to transform the potential of smartphone-based CV technologies into practical tools for vital information on traffic violations.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30107
Recent advances in paraphrase detection reveal a fundamental trade-off: large language models achieve high accuracy but require high computation, while efficient Siamese-BERT variants offer practical scalability with reduced transparency in rationale generation. We present R-DEIM Net, a 76M-parameter dual-expert architecture exploring whether moderate-scale models can achieve competitive accuracy on paraphrase detection while enabling human-readable rationale generation. The architecture combines two specialized components: an Interaction Expert that captures token-level similarity patterns through multi-scale 2D convolutions and attention head allowing variable input length, and a Reasoning Expert that uses a Flan-T5-small decoder to generate rationales as auxiliary supervision. Rather than re-encoding generated text, we extract and pool decoder hidden states as complementary features for classification. On the Quora Question Pairs dataset, R-DEIM Net achieves 90.07\% accuracy and 90.16\% F1-score via 10-fold cross-validation. This represents competitive performance with strong transformer-based baselines (e.g., MFAE BERT: 90.54\% accuracy) and recent large language model based approaches (LLaMA-70B) while using a substantially smaller parameter budget. The model generates rationales alongside predictions, providing potential for auxiliary human-readable descriptions.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30100
We present NNV3, the latest version of the Neural Network Verification (NNV) tool, a MATLAB framework for formal verification of deep learning models and learning-enabled cyber-physical systems. Building on the set-based reachability foundation of NNV 1.0 (FFNNs, CNNs, NNCS) and NNV 2.0 (RNNs, SSNNs, neural ODEs), NNV3 introduces new members of the Star-set family: ModelStar for verifying networks under weight perturbation, VolumeStar for video and 3D volumetric inputs, and GraphStar for graph neural networks. A conformal-inference-based probabilistic reachability mode complements sound analysis for problems where deterministic verification is intractable, while FairNNV certifies counterfactual and individual fairness properties over continuous input regions. NNV3 introduces new benchmarks for malware detection, graph-based power-system models, medical imaging, variable-length time series data, and action recognition. NNV3 also incorporates tutorials and developer guides through a unified documentation site. This paper details these major updates, demonstrating NNV's maturation into a comprehensive, robust, and accessible verification tool for a diverse range of AI systems.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30050
Detecting which holds a climber uses, and when, underpins automated scoring, movement analysis, and assistive systems for sport climbing. Existing approaches train task-specific models or repurpose 2D pose estimators whose hand keypoint sits at the wrist and foot keypoint at the ankle i.e. offset from the fingertips and toes that actually contact the holds, and whose hands are occluded in roughly half of all frames. We show that a frozen, off-the-shelf pose foundation model is sufficient: using the fingertip and toe keypoints of Sapiens, a per-frame proximity test against the annotated holds, per-limb mutual exclusion, and a short temporal-persistence rule, we detect hold usage without any climbing-specific training. On the The Way Up dataset (22 videos, 10 athletes, two routes), our method reaches an event F_1 of 90.2% on a held-out split (89.8% under leave-one-participant-out cross-validation) and 79.9% over all 22 videos at any temporal overlap, and performs best on footholds (F_1,89.8% overall, 96.6% held-out). Under an identical protocol it exceeds our reproductions of the YOLOv8-pose and ViTPose pipelines at every temporal threshold, with the margin widening under strict timing. An ablation shows that two intuitively helpful additions---dense foundation-feature change gating and body-part segmentation---both hurt, arguing that a minimal, keypoint-only design is the right one for this task. Finally, standard coaching statistics computed from our automatic predictions track ground truth closely (Pearson r=1.00 for climb time, 0.94 for pace), turning ordinary single-camera video into reliable performance metrics with no instrumentation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30026
Vietnamese speech research is constrained by resources that isolate automatic speech recognition from speaker, dialect, code-switching, and deepfake analysis. We introduce VietPrism, an open, multi-domain corpus that brings these dimensions together at scale: 993.4 hours and 403,941 bona fide utterances from 1,262 verified speakers across 8,388 real-world videos. To our knowledge, it is the first large-scale Vietnamese corpus to jointly provide transcripts, consistent speaker identities, five dialect groups, and naturally occurring Vietnamese--English code-switching, which constitutes nearly half of the corpus by duration. We further create over 3.1K hours of spoof speech with four open-source and commercial synthesis systems. Every spoof is conditioned on a verified speaker reference and paired with a transcript- and speaker-matched bona fide utterance, enabling unique controlled evaluation with reduced lexical and identity confounds. Zero-shot evaluation of five pretrained multilingual detectors reveals striking brittleness: EER greatly varies across detector--generator pairings, while recent multilingual detector DFA-1B degrades from 16.3% to 33.6% as speaker similarity increases. Dialect-stratified results expose further model-dependent disparities. By unifying natural linguistic diversity with controlled spoof generation, VietPrism provides a challenging foundation for Vietnamese speech modeling and trustworthy audio-deepfake detection.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30005
Self-consistency has become a popular technique for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models by generating multiple reasoning paths and selecting the final answer through a majority vote. However, because model providers typically charge users in proportion to the number of reasoning paths generated, they have a financial incentive to artificially increase the path count. In this work, we show that an unfaithful provider can exploit this incentive using a simple, efficient algorithm while avoiding detection by an auditor: by generating and strategically reordering additional reasoning paths, the algorithm makes every path appear necessary to reach the majority. To validate our algorithm, we conduct experiments with multiple instruct models from the Llama and Qwen families, as well as reasoning models distilled from DeepSeek-R1, on benchmark datasets spanning mathematics, science, and question answering. Our results suggest that the distribution of additional reasoning paths generated by our algorithm is heavy-tailed and that substantial capacity to overcharge remains even under the best possible audit designed to keep the false-positive rate below $\alpha = 0.1$.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30352
Fine-grained object detectors are commonly evaluated with confusion matrices, which show where the model is confused but not why, nor whether the confusion can be reduced. We argue that confusion can be attributed to distinct, separable sources, each quantitatively measurable, turning a passive measurement into actionable guidance. We present $A^2E^2$, a diagnostic tool that decomposes the sources of confusion along two axes, $\{$aleatoric, epistemic$\} \times \{$within-class, between-class$\}$, giving a $2\times2$ taxonomy that enumerates the source types. Each quadrant is measured by its own quantity, computed in one of three places (input geometry, output-space disagreement, and the bias-parameter posterior), so the two epistemic sources are separated by construction rather than by an empirical correlation. On fine-grained aircraft detection, the four quadrants become four named sources with their own remedy verdict: affinity (geometric similarity, irreducible from size alone), heterogeneity (geometrically heterogeneous sub-variants, pointing to re-labeling rather than more data), contested (an insufficiently trained but learnable boundary, improvable), and collapsed (a class starved of data, reducible). After attributing the confusion to a specific reducible source, we apply a targeted intervention and verify experimentally that it reduces the diagnosed source specifically while leaving the irreducible sources unchanged. $A^2E^2$ thus turns confusion measurement into a concrete, validatable and actionable "diagnosis" in which the same off-diagonal mass can carry opposite causes and opposite remedies. We also state this framework's limits, including which sources are only partially identifiable on this specific dataset and why.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29959
WCE produces large-scale gastrointestinal image data yet pathological findings remain significantly underrepresented limiting the generalization performance of deep-learning based abnormality detection systems. SDG methods offer a practical solution to mitigate this imbalance. However their training directly on scarce abnormal samples often results in instability overfitting and structural distortions. Addressing these challenges requires controlled adaptation mechanisms that preserve anatomical priors while enabling realistic pathological variation. This paper presents EndoFSA a GAN-based model for Endoscopic Few-Shot image generation by Adaptation in WCE imaging. EndoFSA leverages a generator pretrained on abundant normal data and adapts it to abnormal domains using limited number of training samples through a rank-constrained parameter adaptation where only a small number of modulation parameters is updated while the pretrained weights remain frozen. By restricting parameter updates to a low dimensional subspace and incorporating perceptual boundary regularization and cluster-wise diversity control EndoFSA enables efficient model adaptation under limited data conditions and mitigates mode collapse while preserving the anatomical priors learned from normal data. Importantly EndoFSA operates without requiring pixel-level annotations, masks or bounding box supervision. Evaluation on publicly available WCE benchmark datasets spanning various abnormal categories demonstrates that EndoFSA generates abnormal images reproducing real lesions morphology. Moreover in a downstream classification task training an image classifier solely on synthetic abnormal images generated by EndoFSA yields performance comparable to that obtained with real images.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29930
LiDAR provides precise geometric information for spatial perception tasks such as object detection in autonomous driving and outdoor robotics. However, recognizing and localizing individual objects is not sufficient to answer questions that require composing spatial relations and grounding the intended target. Motivated by recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for autonomous driving, we leverage their language priors to interpret complex spatial questions and ground the referred target in LiDAR geometry. To support this spatial grounding capability, we introduce SpatialLiDAR-QA, which combines single- and multi-step relational grounding with complementary spatial understanding tasks. We further propose SpatialLiDAR-LM, which aligns LiDAR point features with an LLM and grounds target coordinates through language-conditioned, position-aware proposal retrieval and local point refinement. This design derives target coordinates directly from local LiDAR geometry rather than through textual language decoding. Experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over representative LiDAR--language models and multi-camera VLMs on precise coordinate prediction tasks. Our dataset and model training code will be publicly released.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29835
Interpretable machine learning for Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly relies on sparse probing methods that identify small sets of neurons claimed to detect and causally influence behaviors such as factuality recall, safety alignment, and hallucination. These claims have important implications for model auditing and behavioral steering, yet they are rarely tested against known failure modes of $L_1$-regularized probing in correlated, high-dimensional feature spaces. We propose a five-step diagnostic protocol covering feature correlation, bootstrap stability, sparse versus dense ranking disagreement, intervention baselines, and cross-dataset evaluation as a minimum standard for sparse-neuron localization claims. We investigate prior work using our proposed approach, specifically on H-neurons using open-source LLMs across TriviaQA, BioASQ, and NQ-Open datasets. Our results demonstrate detection replicates across both models and datasets, and exceeds the original reported AUROC gaps for TriviaQA and BioASQ datasets. Gemma 3 4B consistently outperforms MedGemma 4B on matched datasets, with AUROC gaps of +0.311 versus +0.235 on TriviaQA, +0.474 versus +0.455 on BioASQ, and +0.128 versus +0.112 on NQ-Open respectively. Causal validation at $n = 500$ with five random seeds shows statistically significant effects beyond random same-layer baselines. At the same time, the diagnostic results indicate that the selected neurons are not uniquely localized. Across the three Gemma 3 4B settings, 19 of 22 selected H-Neurons have Pearson $|r| > 0.7$ with other features, bootstrap selections show only moderate stability, and sparse and dense rankings overlap only weakly. Our findings show that sparse predictive structure can coexist with non-unique neuron selection. Routine diagnostic validation is necessary to distinguish detection claims from localization claims in mechanistic interpretability.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29781
Anomalous sound detection (ASD) has long been dominated by k-nearest-neighbor (KNN) based detectors, which essentially perform implicit likelihood estimation over normal samples. In this work, we investigate whether generative models can better serve this role. We propose Relative Mismatch, a generative ASD backend powered by flow matching, which learns a velocity field that transports Gaussian noise to a representative feature space of normality. During inference, it measures the mismatch between the oracle and predicted path velocities and aggregates them through a two-level design. To mitigate the inherent mismatch offsets incurred by domain shift, each query is further calibrated with the mismatch of its local normal reference, thereby exposing only its deviation beyond normality. Extensive experiments on DCASE 2020--2025 demonstrate that Relative Mismatch outperforms state-of-the-art backends with the highest score of 71.01, along with strong robustness and training stability. Furthermore, we show that curating a compact and discriminative feature space is the key to unleash the power of generative models for ASD.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29746
Objective: Heart failure (HF) presents a healthcare challenge due to its high comorbidity burden, aging patient population and frequent hospitalizations. Remote monitoring offers a promising approach to managing HF patients by early detection of health deterioration. Developing autonomous systems to detect signs of worsening in telemonitoring data is of interest to reduce the workload of healthcare personnel. Methods: We propose the TRACER model, a Transformer with Contrastive Event Representation, designed to predict timelines leading to rare hospitalization events in low-resolution and irregularly sampled telemonitoring data. TRACER incorporates time-aware embeddings for each biomarker, contrastive pre-training to enhance anomaly detection via representation learning, and independent binary classifiers for detection. We used measurement data containing remotely recorded biomarker sequences from 276 HF patients segmented into overlapping windows based on temporal rules, and labeled the windows based on the occurrence of HF relevant hospitalizations at the latter edge of the window. Results: TRACER was able to correctly predict 66.7% timelines leading up to HF hospitalizations in the highly imbalanced real-world dataset with an overestimation of 7.9%. Reformulating the training of TRACER as an event detection problem improved the predictive performance compared with training directly on forecasting windows, enabling more effective use of the limited hospitalization events. Conclusion: TRACER demonstrated superior performance in detecting signs of worsening status in real-world telemonitoring data compared to the other tested models. Significance: TRACER shows promise in identifying signs of clinical deterioration that allow for alerts to be generated to provide counteractive treatment in patients with HF.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29742
Modern neural audio watermarking systems typically embed a message repeatedly across time and then collapse the resulting temporal evidence into a single payload using averaging, voting, or another fixed aggregation rule. We argue that this temporal collapse limits both robustness and the recovery of multiple payloads, and that the limitation can be addressed without retraining the underlying watermarker. We freeze a pretrained watermarker's encoder and detector and train only a low-latency Conformer-based decoder. The decoder consumes the detector's temporal soft outputs, which a system-specific adapter pools into a sequence of window-level representations, and predicts the embedded message. On three frozen watermarkers (AURA, AudioSeal, and WavMark), the learned decoder improves recovery of attacked messages and yields higher detection AUROC point estimates on all three. Under controlled full- and partial-coverage multiplexing, it improves joint-exact recovery of two alternating payload words by 9.7-48.0, 6.9-17.3, and 8.2-14.2 percentage points, respectively, under one to three chained attacks on feasible clips.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29737
Arabic-language stance detection remains challenging, and previous shared-task systems have largely relied on multitask learning and ensembles. While these systems achieve state-of-the-art performance, their applicability and transferability are limited by the additional complexity introduced by multitask this http URL reduce this complexity, we introduce $\texttt{CLASP-Ar}$, which reformulates the task as cloze-style masked language modeling. In this approach, the target, predicted sentiment, and text are combined into a single prompt whose $\texttt{[MASK]}$ prediction is restricted to a verbalizer-constrained label vocabulary.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29733
Bias in AI systems is typically framed as a flaw to be minimized, yet it also serves as a critical indicator of underlying weaknesses in data, modeling assumptions, and system design. Existing approaches often treat bias as an isolated problem rather than as evidence that can strengthen verification and governance across the AI lifecycle. This paper aims to reconceptualize bias as a diagnostic tool that supports rigorous AI verification. We seek to develop a multidimensional framework to analyze bias, demonstrate how biases emerge in both Traditional and Generative AI, and provide a structured pathway for verification-driven mitigation. We present a multidimensional framework analyzing bias across four dimensions: origin sources, emergence points throughout the AI modeling lifecycle, technical and methodological causes, and validation approaches for detection and mitigation. Through a comprehensive typology spanning traditional and generative AI systems, we demonstrate how biases manifest and propagate across development stages. Our analysis encompasses 30 distinct bias types, 16 verification methods, and 20 countermeasures, providing an actionable roadmap for practitioners. We introduce a hierarchical evidence framework that distinguishes internal validity (mechanistic integrity of AI systems) from external validity (contextual reliability in deployment environments). The framework reveals how biases manifest and propagate across modeling stages, enabling systematic mapping between bias types, verification techniques, and effective countermeasures. The proposed evidence hierarchy clarifies how different verification strategies contribute to mechanistic integrity and contextual reliability. We advocate for ''Ethics by Design'' principles that integrate bias verification throughout the development lifecycle, enabling the construction of fairer, more robust, and trustworthy AI systems.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29730