Speech-breath segmentation is a fundamental preprocessing step in respiratory audio analysis, enabling applications such as respiratory acoustic biomarker extraction, lung function prediction and disease monitoring. Existing approaches, including threshold methods, Fourier Transform-based techniques, and unsupervised and pretrained voice activity detection (VAD) models, primarily focus on speech detection and often classify breathing events as non-speech or silence, limiting their applicability for precise breath detection. To address this limitation, we propose BreathGRU, a semi-supervised Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) framework specifically designed for speech-breath segmentation. The proposed framework combines frame-level acoustic feature extraction with bidirectional recurrent modelling, pseudo-label refinement and duration-constrained Segmental Viterbi decoding to produce speech and breath segmentation. BreathGRU was evaluated against the existing approaches, using manually annotated recordings. Performance was assessed using event-based, time-based, overlap-based, duration-based and boundary-based segmentation metrics. Experiment results demonstrated that BreathGRU achieved the highest breath event recall (0.83), the lowest onset-localisation error (0.14s) and the highest Mean Match Intersection over Union (0.81), with competitive overall segmentation performance compared to large pretrained VAD models like Silero. Qualitative evaluation on manually annotated recordings further showed close agreement between BreathGRU and manual annotation, with better breath detection compared to Silero. These findings demonstrate that explicit breath event modelling provides advantages over general-purpose VAD models and establish BreathGRU as an effective speech-breath segmentation framework which can be applied for respiratory audio analysis and pulmonary healthcare applications.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31165
Recent advances in sign language understanding have achieved impressive success on short, single-sentence videos, yet their performance drops sharply when applied to long, continuous sign language videos. To bridge this gap, we focus on a challenging and realistic setting: Visual-only Sentence-level Sign Language Segmentation (Vis-SSLS), which aims to partition continuous sign language videos into non-overlapping sentence-level segments without any caption assistance, serving as a crucial prerequisite for downstream recognition and translation tasks. However, sentence transitions in sign language are often smooth and visually ambiguous, lacking explicit pauses or posture resets. As a result, static frame representations may fail to capture the subtle temporal changes that indicate sentence boundaries. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{SignShift}, a difference-aware segmentation framework that explicitly models frame-to-frame feature variation as semantic cues for sentence boundary detection. First, to model the feature variation, we design a Temporal Difference Module, which incorporates full-frame, facial, and hand cues, and employs inter-frame differencing to learn multi-scale temporal variations that capture both fine-grained local kinematics and global semantic transitions. Second, to mitigate over- and under-segmentation issues, we design a Segment Count Prediction module, which predicts the number of sentences to guide boundary selection. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that SignShift substantially outperforms existing methods, validating its effectiveness.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31148
The growing availability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools creates new opportunities to support engineering design processes, yet their current use often remains limited to isolated tasks such as coding, documentation, or information retrieval. Less attention has been given to how AI can support cooperative engineering workflows at the process level, where teams must coordinate requirements, tasks, communication, knowledge transfer, and subsystem integration. This paper investigates this challenge in the context of the European Rover Challenge (ERC), where student teams design and integrate complex rover systems within a single academic cycle under strict time constraints and high subsystem interdependence. We conducted a role adaptive 40 question survey with ERC 2025 teams, yielding 104 responses from 14 teams. The survey examined team structure, knowledge transfer, task management, integration practices, communication patterns, and current AI usage. The results reveal recurring workflow bottlenecks, including limited documentation, unclear requirements, fragmented communication, informal task monitoring, and substantial integration rework. Based on these findings, we derive requirements for AI augmented cooperative engineering work-flows and propose an initial assistant system architecture that connects user facing interfaces, credential management, service selection, specialized AI services, and external engineering tools. The proposed architecture aims to support task clarification, requirement and compliance management, communication summarization, integration risk detection, and continuous knowledge capture. In doing so, the paper contributes empirical requirements and an architectural direction for AI augmented cooperative engineering workflows in hybrid human AI team settings.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31136
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a promising safety technique for reasoning models, enabling detection of problematic reasoning before models act. A key concern is encoded reasoning, where models hide their true reasoning in ways that monitors and humans cannot interpret. Optimization pressure from CoT monitors during reinforcement learning is considered a likely driver of such behavior. We investigate this by training reasoning models to perform a main task and a side task, while penalizing them when a monitor detects reasoning about the side task. Surprisingly, models learn to evade monitors without encoding their reasoning. Instead, they learn to phrase and format their chains of thought such that monitors fail to flag side task reasoning, while the reasoning remains completely transparent to human readers. We call this phenomenon monitor jailbreaking. We find that monitor jailbreaking arises across different model sizes, monitors, and tasks. Jailbreaks generalize to monitors not seen during training, including both less and more capable monitors, and transfer across different monitor prompts. While jailbreaking strategies appear simple, manually replicating them does not reliably fool monitors. Finally, we show that paraphrasing is an effective defense: paraphrasing a jailbroken CoT allows the same monitor to correctly flag it, while still allowing the model to perform both tasks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31121
Large Language Model (LLM) pollution occurs when synthetic responses contaminate data intended to capture human behavior. High deployment costs have so far limited the risk posed by autonomous survey agents. However, open-weight models paired with open-source agentic frameworks may have removed this barrier. We compared the performance and detectability of nine agent configurations, ranging from fully open variants to closed commercial ones. Each agent autonomously completed a survey containing multiple response types yielding various detection checks. Fully open agents ran locally without usage fees and performed competitively with commercial alternatives. Open and commercial agents failed different sets of checks, and no single check reliably detected all agents, but open-text responses discriminated best between agents and humans. These findings identify fully open agents as a distinct risk for LLM pollution and support multilayered detection strategies emphasizing open-text analysis.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31054
Collaborative science learning requires nuanced interpretation of student dialogue to characterize how learners identify knowledge gaps, build explanations, and work toward resolution - a theory-driven analysis that is labor-intensive and difficult to scale. We investigate whether instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) can support multidimensional analysis of collaborative sensemaking without task-specific training, and whether structured knowledge-state information improves model inference. We evaluate two mid-size LLMs on 23 richly annotated, expert-labeled episodes across prompting conditions that vary definitional scaffolding, reasoning mode, and turn structure. Without reasoning, models tend to overpredict successful sensemaking; reasoning-enabled prompting improves identification of unsuccessful cases. Knowledge-state diagnostics provide additional grounding, improving detection of unsuccessful sensemaking and increasing agreement with expert annotations. No single configuration performs best across all sensemaking dimensions, underscoring the multidimensional nature of the task.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31046
Open-vocabulary 3D maps enable robots to reason about previously unknown environments using natural language. However, existing systems typically segment every incoming image, associate detections with persistent 3D segments, and frequently perform costly Vision-Language (VL) inference. We present TRACKGRAPH, an online open-vocabulary system that maintains short-term 2D mask identity directly in the image stream before fusing segments into 3D. FastSAM masks and CLIP features are computed at sparse keyframes, while dense DINOv3 features are used to propagate masks at a high rate in between. The resulting tracked masks are fused into a class-agnostic 3D segment layer within a hierarchical scene graph, with 3D association handling tracking interruptions and long-term revisits. Compact multi-view CLIP embeddings enable open-vocabulary retrieval. Across Replica, ScanNet++, and HM3D, TRACKGRAPH achieves competitive open-vocabulary segmentation and retrieval against state-of-the-art mapping methods, including the highest synonym frequency on Replica (0.50). On the same NVIDIA A100, it is 1.7x faster and uses 3.3x less GPU memory than ViT-H OVI-MAP. Real-world quadruped deployments demonstrate onboard scene graph construction and object search at 7.5Hz, while recorded drone data is used to test the method under aerial viewpoints.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31005
We present FLIP, a final-layer inference-time probe for testing whether a logit-facing intervention site in an open-weight vision-language model (VLM) supports structured, task-linked computation rather than generic perturbation. Behavioral change under internal intervention is otherwise mechanistically ambiguous: it may reflect improved use of visual evidence, generic output instability, or outright degradation. FLIP applies elementwise flooring to the final normalized hidden state before logit computation, leaving parameters, prompts, and decoding unchanged. On a controlled detection/counting probe, sweeping intervention strength reveals three regions: negligible change, a bounded interior regime in which detection recall at IoU 0.50 ($R_{50}$) improves while tolerant counting error ($\mathcal{E}_{\mathrm{count}}$) falls, and over-suppression. We formalize a four-criterion probe-and-sweep protocol for disciplining the interpretation of intervention effects: regime structure, grounding-proxy alignment, feature-coherence dependence, and failure to reproduce the same positive regime on a performance-based negative control. The post-normalization state passed to the output head is the logit-facing instantiation of this test; under a non-targeted flooring sweep it satisfies the full protocol. Raw decoder-layer interventions, including the last-block output before final normalization, and the singleton-pair left/right control fail to reproduce the Final-site signature, while same-site operators and multiple VLMs replicate it. FLIP is therefore a validation step for intervention-based mechanistic interpretability, not a steering method.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30993
Recent audio deepfake detectors separate bona fide speech from synthetic speech, yet it remains unclear which stage of a text-to-speech system supplies the detection evidence. We address this with controlled resynthesis and detector adaptation in an F5-TTS-BigVGAN pipeline. Since vocoder reconstruction of a real mel can itself be separable from the source utterance, we fix the vocoder and trace the larger change in detector separation to acoustic generation. Adversarially fine-tuning the acoustic model, with no detector in its objective, raises EER against fixed detectors at comparable quality. However, adapting a detector only on the tuned model's VCTK outputs lowers its LibriSpeech EER from 19.42% to 7.46% and improves detection of unseen base F5-TTS outputs. These results suggest that acoustic-model updates can reduce the detection evidence available to fixed detectors, while detector adaptation keeps the updated outputs detectable in this pipeline.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30983
Text-to-image diffusion models enable data-efficient "mimicry" attacks, wherein adversaries fine-tune the model on a handful of public photos to synthesize convincing forgeries of a target individual. A common countermeasure is to embed imperceptible, low-energy watermarks, yet recent studies show these signatures are brittle: modest post-processing or lightweight adversarial perturbations readily suppress detection, exposing a fundamental tension between imperceptibility and robustness. We introduce FeatMark, a watermarking framework that shifts from pixel-level, energy-starved perturbations to inconspicuous semantic features: small, scene-consistent micro-features that remain natural to humans while providing a stronger, machine-verifiable provenance signal. FeatMark builds domain-specific feature banks that encode each watermark as a compact concept program, pairing open-vocabulary semantic cues with reliable edit regions and instruction templates. It then automatically selects features that are both feasible and executable and injects them through modular, mask-guided concept editing, yielding highly localized, scene-consistent micro-edits that are difficult to perceive. We conduct extensive experiments across VGGFace2, CelebA-HQ, and WikiArt, evaluating against 10 strong watermark removal/purification attacks (including regeneration-style purification) and several bespoke adaptive attacks tailored to FeatMark, to assess perceptual fidelity, watermark detection accuracy, and robustness. We further demonstrate FeatMark's extensibility to video mimicry attacks. The results show FeatMark remains virtually impervious, withstanding all evaluated attacks with negligible bit-accuracy and fidelity degradation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30980
Rapid advances in AI-generated video (AIGV) have increased the risks posed by deceptive video manipulation. Unlike fully synthetic videos, manipulated videos retain most source content and alter only localized regions, making forensic analysis particularly challenging. Existing video forgery research faces two limitations in both data and methodology: (1) High-quality datasets and benchmarks tailored for manipulated videos remain scarce. (2) Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) extend forgery analysis beyond binary classification but struggle to use low-level forensic cues and provide precise pixel-level grounding. Specifically, we introduce ManiVid, a unified forensic analysis task covering forgery detection, artifact grounding, and anomaly explanation for manipulated videos. We construct ManiVid-38K, the first dataset to combine paired, open-vocabulary localized manipulations of general videos with authenticity labels, forgery masks, and anomaly explanations. It comprises about 19K manually verified real-fake video pairs, mostly at 1080P resolution, generated under 2 paradigms with 15 powerful generation models. We sample 1K pairs for ManiVidBench, balanced across six manipulation types and generation models for fair evaluation. We further propose ManiVidLens, a unified framework for explainable video forgery analysis. Its Forensic Evidence Router supplies shared low-level forensic evidence for multimodal reasoning and video segmentation. Its Prompt Distill Module converts grounding states into semantic and geometric prompts and distills spatial priors for mask decoding and full-video propagation. ManiVidLens achieves relative gains over the strongest comparison methods in artifact grounding (+21.1% mIoU; +21.3% J&F) and anomaly explanation (+131.3% ROUGE-L; +9.9% CSS). Its forgery detection remains comparable to dedicated classifiers (0.914 Acc; 0.913 F1).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30934
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to assess long-form medical videos, but their effectiveness may depend on whether transcripts are provided in full or compressed through summarization, retrieval, or claim screening. This study examines how such transcript compression affects LLM-based veracity classification of Japanese medical YouTube videos. We compare four transcript input designs: full transcripts, LLM-generated summaries, RAPTOR-based retrievalaugmented generation (RAG), and Screening, which extracts candidate medical and health-related sentences. Using 74 long-form videos labeled as Real or Fake, we evaluate classification performance and analyze linguistic changes using J-LIWC, hedge expressions, and institutional or technical terms. The full-transcript Baseline achieved the best performance, whereas all compressed inputs increased false negatives, meaning that Fake videos were more likely to be misclassified as Real. Summary caused the largest performance drop, while Screening performed best among the compressed inputs but still omitted many medically relevant sentences. Linguistic analyses showed that these errors were not explained by a simple increase in certainty. Instead, Summary reduced affective, social, temporal, cognitive, and conversational cues, while Summary and RAG made institutional and technical terms more salient. These findings suggest that transcript compression can represent Fake videos as more coherent and authoritative inputs, thereby weakening cues needed for misinformation detection
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30882
Existing attacks and defenses for diffusion-based large language models (dLLMs) target specific vulnerabilities but lack a shared framework explaining why attacks succeed. We propose one by interpreting safety alignment as shaping the denoising energy landscape: a well-aligned model routes harmful queries toward safe outputs through an energy barrier that separates the two regions. Current jailbreak attacks reduce to two strategies for circumventing this barrier: obscuring the query's safety disposition at initialisation, or intervening mid-trajectory to force the denoising path across the energy barrier. From this perspective and the result that masked diffusion models minimise kinetic energy during denoising, we derive three complementary, training-free detection signals: a step-0 ratio that reads the initial safety disposition from the logit distribution before generation begins, and two trajectory-velocity signals that track kinetic energy in complementary subspaces of the logit space. An attack must either reveal its intent at initialisation or expend kinetic energy to cross the barrier in at least one monitored subspace, so the three signals cover each other's blind spots in the energy budget by construction. Evaluation across three dense dLLMs (LLaDA-8B, LLaDA-1.5, Dream-7B) and a sparse mixture-of-experts dLLM (LLaDA-MoE-7B) confirms this complementarity. In stress tests of known attacks, every configuration that evades detection also fails to produce harmful content, suggesting that the detection and barrier-crossing thresholds are hard to separate.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30841
Binocular rendering requires two nearby views of the same scene and therefore repeats substantial visibility and shading work. We present a 2D Gaussian Splatting (2DGS) pipeline that fully renders a dominant-eye RGB image and an alpha-weighted depth proxy, reprojects that image to the affiliated eye, and repairs uncovered pixels. Small interior gaps are interpolated, whereas larger disoccluded regions are identified as regions of interest (ROIs) and selectively re-rendered. The depth proxy reuses the alpha-blending weights computed during dominant-eye rasterization, avoiding a separate depth-rendering pass. An adaptive ROI generator localizes the required updates using reprojected image boundaries and optional connected center-hole detection. On DTU, Tanks and Temples, and MipNeRF-360, the method reduces the measured time of a sequential two-pass binocular reference by 15.5\% to 28.8\% and peak GPU memory by 6\% to 11\%. The corresponding affiliated-eye quality degradation is at most 1.3 dB PSNR, 0.02 SSIM, and 0.02 LPIPS, representing a measurable trade-off that requires application-specific perceptual validation. These results establish a practical efficiency-quality trade-off for controlled static-scene stereo rendering and motivate future evaluation under continuous motion and on physical VR hardware.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30741
Joint video moment retrieval and highlight detection requires identifying query-relevant temporal segments while estimating clip-level saliency, yet DETR-style pipelines do not explicitly preserve query-relevant evidence throughout encoding, decoding, and cross-task prediction. We propose EviDETR, an evidence-preserving framework with three components. Semantic-aware Feature Reweighting (SFR) enhances query-relevant clip representations through saliency estimation and cross-modal interaction. A Temporal Top-2 Mixture-of-Experts (TTop2MoE) decoder performs query-adaptive refinement via sparse expert routing. MR-to-HD (MR2HD) fusion transfers span-level retrieval evidence to clip-level highlight prediction through confidence-weighted multi-scale aggregation. Using CLIP+SlowFast features, EviDETR achieves 69.29 R1@0.5, 54.77 R1@0.7, and 48.41 Avg. mAP for moment retrieval on QVHighlights, together with 41.83 HD-mAP and 68.33 HIT@1. Strong results on TACoS and Charades-STA further demonstrate cross-dataset transferability.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30724
Real-world multimodal misinformation often involves mixed forgery sources, requiring sample-specific detection strategies. Existing tool-augmented methods rely on predefined workflows or inference-time planning, limiting adaptability or increasing inference cost. To address this issue, we introduce \textbf{MM-VeriAgent}, which learns to verify mixed-source multimodal misinformation with tools. We first build \textbf{MM-VeriTools}, a specialized toolkit for misinformation detection agents. By benchmarking various candidate models and methods on the sub-tasks required by mixed-source detection, we select the strongest for textual, visual, and cross-modal forgery analysis and encapsulate them as callable tools with a unified interface. On top of this toolkit, we train the LVLM agent with reinforcement learning to teach it how to use these tools to better solve mixed-source detection. Since many of the tools are specialized models whose online execution at every rollout severely limits RL efficiency, we further introduce \textbf{Tool-Execution Cache}, which pre-executes candidate tool calls and reuses their cached outputs during training. This preserves multi-step rollouts while reducing online tool execution, largely improving the training this http URL on MMFakeBench demonstrate substantial accuracy gains over the base model without explicit tool search at inference time. Ablation and efficiency analyses further validate the learned tool-use policy and show that Tool-Execution Cache reduces online tool executions during training.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30698
Large language model email assistants are particularly vulnerable to indirect prompt injection because untrusted email content can be retrieved into the model context and influence subsequent tool use. Existing prompt injection detectors mainly formulate this problem as binary malicious text classification, which overlooks the important factor that harmful agent behavior often arises through a sequence of stages. We propose a detection framework that models this attack chain by combining a text detector, verifiers specific to each stage, explicit rule-based risk signals, user intent and action consistency analysis, and a logistic decision policy. To support this framework, we derive attack chain labels from prompt injection datasets, evaluate the proposed framework under random splits, temporal phase transfer, conditional stage transfer, cross-dataset transfer, and conduct ablation studies on multiple benchmarks. Results show that random train test splits substantially overestimate robustness under distribution shift, while later tool argument stages are more predictable than earlier stages in the framework. We also show that training on harmless emails that resemble attacks helps reduce false alarms while preserving the ability to detect real attacks. Across five binary benchmarks, our framework achieves a mean F1 score of 0.406 under the strict threshold setting policy, compared with 0.216 for the strongest of five pretrained detectors evaluated without additional training. These results highlight the value of combining attack stage predictions with checks for conflicts between the user's request and instructions in retrieved emails. Our experiments also demonstrate the importance of training with challenging benign examples to balance attack detection and false alarms.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30657
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integrated into software development workflows, concerns regarding unintentional biases in AI-generated code. Although evidence suggests these biases exist, limited research has systematically identified, categorized, and explained them. This study investigates bias in AI-generated code and evaluates whether LLMs can reliably identify and explain it through a taxonomy-driven framework. We extended an existing dataset of biased AI-generated Python code and manually annotated snippets with bias categories and human-authored justifications to establish a ground-truth dataset. Using this dataset, we evaluated proprietary and open-source LLMs as automated bias detection and justification systems through ICL. Finally, we analyzed similarity between LLM-generated explanations and human-authored justifications using structured justification and code identification metrics. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can effectively support code bias identification and explanation. Gemini achieved 80.14% classification accuracy, with 84.0% precision and 95.7% recall, while the best open-source alternative, Qwen3-coder, achieved 82.45% accuracy, 68.64% precision, and 80.22% recall. Additionally, the models achieved justification similarity scores of 80.4% and 80.14%, respectively, relative to human-authored reasoning, and code identification similarity scores of 86.0% and 87.82%. These results suggest that LLMs can detect biased logic in generated Python code and produce explanations that substantially align with expert interpretations.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30642
Collision detection is critical for ensuring the safety of planned paths. However, it imposes a non-negligible computational burden on motion planners, motivating extensive studies on collision-detection acceleration. In commonly used phase-based collision-detection methods, the broad phase employs hierarchical structures to rapidly discard object pairs that are clearly collision-free, while the subsequent narrow phase performs detailed collision checks on the remaining object pairs whose collision status cannot be determined by the broad phase. Although these methods effectively reduce the number of detailed checks through broad-phase pruning, the narrow phase is usually executed in the default order returned by the broad phase, with little explicit optimization of the check order. This leaves room for further acceleration, especially in cluttered environments where many object pairs may remain after the broad phase and the narrow phase can account for a significant portion of the total detection time. In this work, we propose a learning-based method to accelerate phase-based collision detection by optimizing the check order in the narrow phase. We first formulate the expected time cost of the narrow phase and derive an optimal check-ordering criterion that minimizes this expectation. Since the priors required by this criterion are difficult to obtain in advance, we design a hypernetwork-based model to predict collision probabilities, which are then used to approximate the optimal check order. The resulting order guides the execution of exact mesh checks in the narrow phase, thereby reducing detection time without replacing the underlying geometric collision checker. Simulation results show that our method effectively accelerates phase-based collision detection and improves the efficiency and success rate of sampling-based motion planning, especially in cluttered environments.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30599
Reference-based LLM-as-a-judge evaluation assumes the reference answer is the target. In deployed agentic systems that operate over dynamic entities (support cases, assets, accounts), the closest available reference typically applies the correct procedure to a different entity, so a literal judge penalizes different identifiers, dates, and statuses as errors or hallucinations. We name this failure mode reference-instance divergence (RID). We propose CARGO, a framework that (i) treats retrieved references as procedural exemplars and grounds factual judgments in the live instance's observed context, (ii) assigns each claim a three-way status (supported, contradicted, unverifiable) and penalizes only contradictions, and (iii) gates evaluation by retrieval confidence, casting production evaluation as selective prediction. We introduce CARGO-Bench, a perturbation-based diagnostic suite with ground truth by construction that separates leniency from discrimination. On CARGO-Bench (246 items, two judge models, 7,872 judgments), the standard reference-based judge penalizes 100% of correct entity-transplanted answers and is uninformative (discrimination index DI ~ 0); supplying the live facts without reframing changes nothing. CARGO eliminates these false penalties (0/50) while retaining near-complete contradiction recall (50/50 and 49/50), raising DI to 0.58 [0.48, 0.68]; a rubric-swap control attributes most of the effect to context-grounded dimension definitions. CARGO also exposes a limitation of its own design: the leniency that protects entity values suppresses detection of procedural corruptions (20% recall). A post-hoc fix does not close the gap, and an LLM-as-annotator study with written guidelines and adjudication shows the same blind spot. We release a preregistered protocol for extending the evaluation to expert agreement, risk-coverage, and cost on production traffic.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30471