Robot foundation models (RFMs), including vision-language-action (VLA) policies, are often discussed through a scaling view: more data, larger models, and broader benchmarks should improve generalization. In robotics, however, a model can generalize while work still remains before it can run on a robot with a particular body. The work required differs across methods and target robots, and those differences affect practical deployment. We call the gap between reusable models, representations, or data and their use in execution on the target robot the embodiment gap. This survey examines what can be reused across robot embodiments and what must still be implemented on a new robot. We place existing methods on a two-axis map that shows the type of shared structure and the stage at which adaptation is needed for execution on the target robot. We then examine recent work through three overlapping research directions: sharing semantics and perception, sharing robot data and interfaces, and learning correspondence across embodiments. We also propose a reporting framework for adaptation work that success rate alone does not reveal. The framework identifies the work that should be checked when comparing cross-embodiment learning and highlights work that remains on a new robot and questions for future study.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18433
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy maps elemental distributions, while optical microscopy can provide complementary morphological context. Localizing XRF fields of view (FOVs) in optical images is difficult because the two modalities differ in contrast mechanism and resolution. Most current workflows place each XRF tile independently, even when acquisition metadata already record the tiles' relative scan positions. This study formalizes XRF tile-group localization, in which one optical-frame placement is estimated for the whole group, constrained by acquisition geometry and quantified using group intersection-over-union (GroupIoU). In a controlled case study, independent localization failed with GroupIoU 0.000, whereas group localization achieved 0.931. Replacing the normalized cross-correlation (NCC) metric with mutual information (MI) gave nearly identical results, showing that the outcome is not specific to one local similarity metric. In another multiscale case study, using a coarse XRF survey scan to connect the fine-scale tile group to the optical image increased mean GroupIoU from 0.694 to 0.856. These case studies support using acquisition geometry as an explicit constraint when localizing related XRF tiles.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18305
Autonomous LLM agents that converse on a user's behalf are an emerging design pattern in matching platforms, yet their viability depends on a condition rarely examined: users must accept not only delegating conversation to an agent, but also receiving agent-mediated communication from others. We study this condition using two large-scale surveys of active users of a major dating platform (N=2,894 on generative profile features; N=2,617 on autonomous conversational agents, fielded in two languages). We develop a latent-variable measurement model of agent receptivity based on graded response models with latent regression, and show via model comparison that willingness to send and willingness to receive agent communication are distinct constructs: highly correlated (rho=0.92) but separable (Delta BIC=52), with partial measurement invariance across languages. The model quantifies a systematic delegation asymmetry: deploying one's own agent requires far lower receptivity (threshold -0.38) than engaging a counterpart's agent (+0.32; full engagement +1.39), and mean deployment propensity exceeds engagement propensity roughly threefold. Under a random-pairing counterfactual derived from stated receptivity, only 4-13% of directed dyads combine agent deployment with receiver engagement, with a pronounced gender-directional imbalance. Design counterfactuals quantify the levers: a reciprocity requirement cuts interaction volume by half or more by excluding nearly two-thirds of would-be deployment, while routing agent contacts on receive receptivity triples per-contact engagement, a lift that survives out-of-sample validation with the target item held out (AUC 0.88, 3.1x quartile lift under respondent-level cross-validation). We discuss implications for agentic recommender design, including disclosure, opt-in mechanics, and receptivity-aware matchmaking.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18058
Academic surveys play a central role in organizing rapidly expanding scholarly literature, yet their construction requires extensive paper analysis, coherent knowledge organization, fine-grained citation support, and reliable manuscript assembly. Existing Deep Research and automated survey generation systems address parts of this process, but typically do not coordinate paper understanding, literature organization, evidence-grounded drafting, and manuscript validation through a shared, revisable state. We introduce DAS, a stateful agentic framework for generating publication-oriented academic surveys. Its key idea is to separate reusable paper analysis from topic-specific manuscript construction. DAS builds on DAS-2M, a dynamically updated metadata lake containing survey-oriented representations of approximately two million papers. Its agents maintain explicit literature, organization, writing, and finalization states through candidate-grounded taxonomy planning, reverse paper-to-section routing, and hierarchical claim and citation planning. Semantic review reactivates only the affected writing states for repair and reevaluation, forming a scoped closed loop with deterministic validation. We further introduce DAS-Bench, a 30-topic benchmark, together with DAS-Eval, which assesses scholarly citation quality, taxonomic synthesis, hierarchical discourse, and manuscript assembly reliability through 16 criteria. Among systems evaluated on all 30 topics, DAS achieves the highest average in all four dimensions, with an overall score of 4.34 compared with 4.03 for the strongest competitor, and the same ordering is preserved on the matched 21-topic CS subset. Blinded expert evaluation further prefers DAS to Naive RAG on 27 of 30 topics and to AutoSurvey on 19 of 21 shared CS topics. The project page is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18034
The health of marine ecosystems is a critical indicator of global environmental change, yet the physical constraints of underwater observation and the intrinsic challenges of processing marine imagery severely limit the scalability of systematic monitoring. While recent visual foundation models such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM) series show great promise, they still struggle with the fine-grained recognition required in these complex scenarios and still require expert supervision. Our work addresses this gap by bridging state-of-the-art foundation models with existing sparse supervision. Because historical benthic surveys are typically annotated with only a few sparse expert points per image, we utilize these legacy point-labels as visual prompts for SAM2. Our primary contribution is a novel mechanism to automatically identify which of these points are suitable, and which are actively harmful, when used for propagation. By filtering out unreliable points, we extract high-quality pseudo-ground-truth masks capable of training more accurate, fine-grained semantic segmentation models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on public benthic data and introduce a new, challenging benchmark featuring real-world sparse expert annotations, paving the way for scalable ecological analysis.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17561
Gender bias or other social biases in large language models (LLMs) are frequently evaluated with question answering or survey benchmarks where the LLM needs to give a response in a predefined answer format. It is well known in survey science that the answer format has a substantial impact on answers, just as LLMs are sensitive to the prompt wording. However, to our knowledge it has not been studied yet how changes in answer format impact the measurement of gender bias in LLMs and their alignment with human response distributions. We evaluate three instruction-tuned models on the BBQ benchmark and OpinionQA survey data across closed-ended, Likert-scaled and open-ended formats, comparing bias measurement and distributional alignment under otherwise identical conditions. We find that answer format does substantially alter measured outcomes, including reversals in order rankings. These differences arise because each format elicits distinct response behaviours, such as forced-choice selection, scale-based distributions and refusal in free-text generation. Our findings highlight the importance of treating answer format as a substantive component of LLM evaluation and motivate multi-format designs for more robust model assessment.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17516
Human-centric intelligence is evolving in the foundation-model era, with growing emphasis on scale, transferability, and general-purpose modeling. Yet it has not fully integrated with foundation models to achieve the comparable progress seen in them. More importantly, recent advances across this broad landscape remain fragmented across tasks, modalities, and research communities, leaving their intrinsic conceptual and methodological connections unclear. To bridge these divides and rethink human-centric intelligence in the foundation-model era, we introduce a full-spectrum human context taxonomy that integrates six interconnected levels by viewing humans as observable subjects through visual appearance and spatial geometry, as dynamic actors through kinematic dynamics and interaction modeling, and as situated agents through world simulation and embodied agency. We next present the methodological foundations of the field, covering human-centric data families, computational architecture paradigms, and representative training and inference optimization strategies. We then systematically review representative methods across these levels and organize the associated datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics. We further discuss open challenges and promising research directions toward human-centric intelligence that is scalable, trustworthy, physically grounded, and deployable, aiming to provide a coherent framework and practical reference for advancing the field. Finally, we provide a systematically organized and continuously updated collection of human-centric AI literature and resources on our project page.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18184
AI agents increasingly act rather than merely read: across the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem, the share of deployed tools that modify external state has risen from 27% to 65% of tool use. When agents exercise this authority on public blockchains through MCP, skills, and tool calling, the consequences of an attack are governed by the blockchain execution layer rather than by conventional software assumptions. This survey argues that four properties of that layer (irreversibility, signing authority, continuous autonomy, and sequence-level composition) qualitatively change the threat model, turning the recoverable failures of generic agent security into a standing, irreversible loss. We organize the fragmented MCP-security literature into an attack-surface taxonomy, then contribute a Web3 risk-mapping matrix that ties each attack class to its amplified impact, the responsible amplifiers, a representative mitigation, and the residual gap. We synthesize defenses, including emerging blockchain-based mechanisms, and find them improving but insufficient: measured protections stop fewer than 30% of attacks, and model-level safety refuses fewer than 3%. We close by positioning the work against adjacent surveys and deriving a research agenda from the matrix's open cells.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17275
Hurricane debris removal is planned, contracted, and federally reimbursed on the basis of volume estimates, yet operational practice still relies on parametric forecasts with 41-90% documented over-estimation or on truck-load tallies that arrive only after hauling begins. We present DebrisHeightNet, a segmentation-conditioned monocular debris-height network that estimates spatially explicit debris volume from a single pass of post-event aerial RGB imagery, the kind of survey routinely flown within days of a hurricane landfall. We train only a lightweight 1.08 M-parameter head on top of two frozen vision foundation models. This head regresses height from a Depth Anything V2 backbone, conditioned on the debris segmentation of CLIPSeg-debris from our prior work. Because no post-hurricane debris-height ground truth exists, we synthesize the training target by confidence-weighted LiDAR-monocular fusion (CW-LMF), designed to suppress non-debris LiDAR returns. This fused target is a constructed supervision signal rather than ground truth, so we corroborate it against external references rather than claiming it as truth. A region-level power-law calibration, driven by each region's low-density debris fraction, converts model volume into an estimate of the reported hauled debris with quantified uncertainty. Across ten regions spanning five hurricanes and three states, the uncalibrated model agrees with an independent uncrewed-aerial-vehicle (UAV) survey of the training region at Spearman $\rho = 0.87$ and lands within 30% of the reported record where the Hazus and FEMA-hybrid parametric forecasts over-predict it by 2.7-4.8$\times$. Deployment requires no LiDAR, no ground access, and no second flight, so the method can produce spatially explicit volume estimates wherever single-pass post-event imagery is flown.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17165
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly answer questions whose correctness depends on visual, textual, temporal, acoustic, document, chart, or embodied evidence. Their failures are therefore not only linguistic. A fluent answer may conceal poor input quality, a perceptual error, weak grounding, conflict between modalities, unstable reasoning, distribution shift, or a question that is not answerable from the supplied evidence. This survey organizes the literature on uncertainty-aware MLLMs around a decision-centered framework: uncertainty sources give rise to observable signals, signals must be calibrated or controlled for risk, and calibrated uncertainty should determine the system action. We review work on token and logit uncertainty, semantic disagreement, perturbation instability, grounding and attribution scores, verbalized confidence, verifier and judge scores, conformal prediction, selective answering, abstention, clarification, retrieval, self-checking, and escalation. The central argument is that uncertainty should not be evaluated only as a confidence number; it should be evaluated by whether it improves behavior under insufficient, conflicting, shifted, or high-risk multimodal evidence. We position this survey against text-only uncertainty and abstention surveys, broad MLLM surveys, MLLM hallucination surveys, and safety-oriented reviews. We conclude with open problems in source-aware decomposition, action-aware benchmarks, calibration under shift, black-box uncertainty estimation, broader modality coverage, reproducible reporting, and human-centered uncertainty communication.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17084
Foundation models are increasingly used for perception, reasoning, planning, and action generation in embodied agents, creating security risks that can propagate from digital inputs to physical behavior. Existing surveys often organize threats by mechanisms such as jailbreaks, prompt injection, backdoors, poisoning, or adversarial examples, but these categories do not consistently identify where an adversary first enters the embodied control loop. We present a trust-boundary-centric survey of foundation-model-powered embodied-agent security. Using a first-compromised-trust-boundary principle, we separate attack surface from attack mechanism and organize the system into five layers and twelve attack surfaces spanning the model supply chain, user instructions, context and memory, physical semantic environments, multimodal perception, world state, internal reasoning, task planning, action interfaces, middleware, multi-agent communication, and execution control. Based on 58 attack records and 61 defense records collected through August 15, 2026, we analyze representative attacks, cross-layer propagation, defense placement, and evaluation practices. Our quantitative analysis shows that attack research is concentrated on multimodal perception and action interfaces, while defenses are especially concentrated on action-level and runtime protection. Context and long-term memory, middleware and networking, world-state integrity, and multi-agent trust remain comparatively underexplored. We conclude with open challenges in state provenance, compositional defenses, long-horizon attack propagation, physical realizability, Byzantine multi-robot behavior, and unified closed-loop evaluation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16843
Modern power systems face growing operational complexity driven by the integration of renewable energy sources, decentralization, and the need for real-time decision-making across a wide range of timescales. Addressing these challenges traditionally relies on model-based methods that, while accurate, can be too slow for operational demands. Machine learning (ML) has therefore emerged as a faster, data-driven alternative. As grid topology plays a central role in power system operation, graph machine learning (GML) methods offer a natural framework for incorporating topological dependencies as an inductive bias. We survey nearly 800 papers at the intersection of GML and power systems, covering forecasting, state estimation, optimization, control, fault diagnosis, and cybersecurity. Power systems constitute an unusually rich benchmark setting for GML, as they combine hard physical constraints, multi-scale dynamics, safety-critical requirements, and scarce labeled data within a single, well-defined domain. Conversely, power systems can benefit from utilizing GML to complement classical solvers, as GML provide scalable, topology-aware approximations with promising generalization and computational efficiency. We identify open challenges, including limited real-world deployment and the need for interpretable models in safety-critical settings. Despite the rapidly growing number of publications, standardized benchmarks and open datasets remain scarce, leaving many results difficult to reproduce and undermining the long-term scientific credibility of the field. We further derive a structured requirements catalog for ML-ready power grid benchmarks, intended to guide future dataset development and improve reproducibility across studies. We call on the community to prioritize dedicated benchmark studies and the release of open datasets and models.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16494
Autonomous operation in GNSS-denied environments requires heterogeneous mapping pipelines to maintain a consistent spatial reference. This paper presents a framework using camouflage-matched fiducial markers fabricated from Cholesteric Spherical Reflectors (CSRs) as pre-surveyed visual anchors. The anchors georeference both a lightweight LiDAR-odometry trajectory and a dense RTAB-Map reconstruction, allowing their outputs to be expressed in a common LUREF frame (geodetic coordinate reference system used in Luxembourg) without requiring GNSS measurements during operation. The method combines coarse similarity alignment with marker-constrained pose-graph optimization. We evaluate it using two handheld acquisition sessions with ground-level and elevated motion profiles emulating UGV and UAV operation. A single iMarker was relocated among six surveyed positions, with the first position revisited to quantify drift correction. Marker-anchor correction reduced revisit inconsistency by 97.9% and 99.1% for the UAV- and UGV-emulating sessions, respectively, and improved held-out anchor prediction compared with one-time alignment. Separately georeferenced dense reconstructions achieved a median cross-session nearest-neighbour distance of 58 cm without explicit cross-session registration. Marker processing operated in real time, while trajectory correction required less than 0.25 s per session. These results demonstrate a proof of concept for georeferencing lightweight odometry and dense reconstructions using visually unobtrusive, pre-surveyed anchors during GNSS-denied operation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16281
Consider a firm that surveys its competition for a particular agentic task and seeks to offer superior accuracy at every competitor price point. A firm that Pareto-dominated its competitors would leave no rational customer a reason to buy elsewhere. This paper shows a path to this kind of capability via agentic evolution over a menu of LLMs, from training pools of at most 100 examples. Given a priced menu of nine LLM endpoints; brief documentation of the task, objective, and API; a simple seed agent; and an operator-chosen per-problem cost target - usually set at an incumbent's own price - RoboPhD, an evolutionary meta-agent, evolves complete agent programs that attack the public frontiers of two semantically dissimilar tasks point by point: DS-1000 (execution-checked code generation) and PaperFindingBench (LLM-judged scientific document retrieval). Our officially scored submissions hold every Pareto-frontier slot but one on the two tasks' leaderboards, including Pareto domination of both the top-scoring and the lowest-cost competing points.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16207
Synthetic populations are critical inputs for activity-based travel demand models, yet generating realistic populations from limited survey data remains challenging. Small samples miss valid attribute combinations, known as sampling zeros, and generative models may also produce infeasible structural zeros. Moreover, realistic synthetic populations must capture both static socio-demographic attributes and sequential travel behaviour, such as trip chains. This paper proposes a regularized two-stage generative framework to address these challenges, where regularization refers to additional loss terms that guide the generator toward broader valid coverage and fewer infeasible samples. In Stage 1, a Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty is augmented with three regularization terms, IGP, LDR, and CLAP, to improve feasibility, diversity, and novelty in tabular population synthesis. In Stage 2, Transformer and LSTM-Attention models generate sequential travel attributes, including departure time, trip purpose, and travel mode, conditioned on the synthesized tabular profiles. We also introduce novelty and count-aware metrics to evaluate whether valid unseen combinations are recovered and generated in realistic proportions. Results show that regularized models outperform the vanilla WGAN-GP across feasibility, diversity, and novelty. Regularization increases feasibility by 2.1 to 3.7 percentage points and novelty by 6.6 to 10.0 percentage points, improving sampling-zero recovery without sacrificing feasibility. The F1 score improves by 6.3 to 8.6 percentage points. For sequential attributes, LSTM-Attention best matches the trip-length distribution, while Transformer achieves higher overall sequential F1, 90.6\% versus 89.1\%. Cross-stage validation confirms strong consistency between generated mobility status and generated trip chains.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15867
Automated pavement-distress detection is commonly framed as a small-object problem, motivating high-resolution P2/4 detection heads and lossless downsampling. We present YOLO26-RD, an end-to-end (NMS-free) detector built on YOLO26 with two lightweight novel modules (LearnableContrast, a 494-parameter differentiable analogue of CLAHE that adapts contrast per tile inside the network, and EdgeSPD, a Sobel-gated space-to-depth downsampler adding only 2 parameters over SPD-Conv), and we subject the design to a data-first audit on a 7,618-image road-survey dataset (alligator crack, linear crack, patching). The audit falsifies the small-object premise: 92% of instances are COCO-large, and linear cracks are extreme-aspect structures (median 10:1) whose difficulty is sensitivity, not localization. Guided by this analysis, we remove the P2 detection level while retaining P2 features in the fusion path, which improves mAP50 by 2.8 points over the full YOLO26-RD model and reduces epoch time by 8%. Trained from scratch at 640x640, our best screening configuration reaches 0.787 mAP50 on the validation split versus a 0.771 project baseline (a stock YOLO26-s of uncontrolled recipe), with the largest per-class gain on the rarest class (patching, 2.6 points over baseline; 9.4 over the unmodified YOLO26-RD control under an identical recipe). A failure-mode decomposition further attributes the residual error of the bottleneck class (crack, approximately 0.74 across all architectures tested) to train/validation distribution shift on crack orientation and length, sub-pixel crack width at 640x640, and label incompleteness, factors no architecture change can address. We argue that for pavement imagery, measurement-driven subtraction outperforms module accretion, and we release our audit protocol alongside the model.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15713
Running large AI models on resource-constrained edge devices requires model compression to reduce model size and computation. What compresses well, however, need not deploy well. We survey dozens of recent works that report compression results on real hardware and extract practical deployment guidelines from them. Following these guidelines, we deploy compact language and image models on GPU, CPU, and Raspberry Pi platforms across question answering and image segmentation. No single technique wins across tasks. For question answering, Qwen3.5 0.8B reaches 93.85 SQuAD F1 and 92 EM under Q5_K_M GGUF quantization, while structured pruning at the same precision costs 16 F1 at a 1% ratio. For segmentation, the ranking reverses: default quantization leaves parameters and MACs unchanged, whereas pruning cuts model size by nearly 80% at near-constant mIoU. Pruning can even inflate the deployed artifact by 21-49% by breaking k-quant super-block alignment; combined with longer, less format-compliant outputs, this raises Raspberry Pi latency up to 3.4x. Compression can also manufacture the appearance of competence rather than destroy it visibly: one LoRA-recovered variant stays fully parseable and holds 71% strict BoolQ accuracy while sending 97 of 100 predictions to a single class, at 52.6% balanced accuracy. We explain these effects through neural-flow graph analysis and prefill-decode-level latency decomposition, and condense them into task-specific deployment research directions. The right technique depends on the task, the model, and the hardware. Our experiment code and artifacts are open-sourced at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15693
How can common ground between societies in conflict be identified when citizens' acceptability of peace agreements is shaped by contested narratives? Such acceptability is mediated not only by the clauses that agreements include or exclude, but crucially by citizens' subjective reasoning concerning agreements' clauses. In this paper, we leverage computational argumentation to introduce a novel approach to identifying mutually acceptable agreements among individuals in conflict, i.e. a Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA). First, we introduce a quantitative bipolar argumentation framework tailored to represent each side's reasoning about peace agreements. We then show how merging these frameworks can enable negotiators to identify peace agreements that are mutually acceptable. To evaluate our approach under conditions of real-world relevance, we focus on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, where long-standing policy, practitioner and public interest underscores the demand for methods capable of analysing polarised public reasoning. We show how our framework identifies a ZOPA through theoretical analysis and preliminary experiments using survey data from both existing work and retrieved by a large language model. The results illustrate how argumentation can empower negotiators and conflict-resolution teams in mapping feasible ZOPAs grounded in citizens' reasoning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15634
Degeneracy detectors for LiDAR registration commonly return six per-axis binary labels. We ask whether these labels are properties of the scene. Under a body-frame change, the point-to-plane information matrix transforms by congruence, H' = Ad(T)^T H Ad(T), not similarity. Congruence preserves nullity and, through the adjoint reparameterization, identifies the same physical twist subspace; the per-axis footprint and a thresholded spectrum need not be invariant. In a noise-free circular tunnel, shifting the origin by one metre changes which degrees of freedom are flagged. A generalized criterion Hv = lambda Mv is universally frame-independent over positive-semidefinite information forms if and only if its metric rule is equivariant. No fixed metric qualifies, while a rig-adapted one exists only at zero screw pitch, met in one of nineteen surveyed calibrations. The equivariant point-displacement metric M = sum_i J_i^T J_i yields dimensionless, scene-scale-invariant generalized eigenvalues. They are invariant to body frame, consistent changes of length unit and scene scales; the threshold also transfers empirically across sequences. Across 365 frame pairs from four public sequences, labels rarely change at practical extrinsic magnitudes, yet a remapping estimator's correction differs between body-frame choices on 44.5-69.5% of pairs, with a median of 0.7-4.0 mm and a maximum of 0.87 m. The per-axis footprint changes even under the equivariant metric, placing the fundamental issue in the reported quantity.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15532
Tactile sensing is essential for robots in contact-rich tasks, yet many tactile sensors still provide sparse, low-dimensional signals that do not capture sufficient information for complex robotic perception and interaction. Vision-based tactile sensors (VBTSs) offer a powerful alternative by con-verting contact-induced deformation of a soft interface into im-ages. The image-based formulation gives VBTSs high-resolution, information-rich tactile observations that enable complex robotic tasks. This review surveys the full VBTS pipeline and treats sensing hardware, learning methods, simulation, and datasets as an integrated sensing-and-learning system. We 1) organize representative VBTSs into a hardware taxonomy structured by deformable elastomer design, sensor size and shape, and optical system design to guide future sensor development; 2) present a hierarchical view of learning-based tactile intelligence from low-level signal understanding to task-level policies and foundation models; and 3) examine simulation platforms and tactile datasets as a scaling layer, together with sim-to-real transfer and cross-sensor adaptation for training, benchmarking, and deployment. Finally, we identify open challenges and future directions for VBTSs in robotics. By providing a holistic view of how hardware, AI architectures, simulation, and datasets interact, this review aims to advance tactile intelligence for contact-rich robotic tasks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15490