Survey
-
Not All Attention Is Equal: A Quantitative Survey of the EEI Trade-off
2026-08-16 00:37:38Aditya SinghAbstract
Attention mechanisms have driven machine learning for a decade, from neural machine translation to language models that do general-purpose reasoning. This survey covers four connected threads: their formulation for sequence-to-sequence tasks, adaptation to computer vision, efficiency innovations that address the quadratic bottleneck, and advances in interpretability. We define three criteria: efficiency, expressiveness, and interpretability, and compare twenty-one methods using an EEI scoring framework. Scores come from a single rater with an assumed +/-1-point perturbation range. A deterministic Monte Carlo analysis with 200,000 samples shows that, under this perturbation model, rank changes of more than one position occur in 67-70% of samples on average. A rank-matched null model reproduces a similar stability profile, so the results support coarse tier-level comparisons rather than fine-grained rankings. The survey traces attention from Bahdanau-Luong alignment through the Transformer and into vision architectures. It reviews fixed and learned sparse attention, linear attention, IO-aware exact algorithms including FlashAttention, and state-space alternatives including Mamba. It also covers induction heads, superposition, and the attention-SSM duality. We further provide a structured narrative review, a benchmark synthesis with cross-study caveats, a five-problem research gap analysis, and a 2015-2026 evolution timeline. We conclude by framing attention research as an expansion of the efficiency-expressiveness-interpretability frontier and identifying future directions including unified efficiency benchmarks, learned routing for hybrid architectures, length generalization, and scalable mechanistic interpretability.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15459
PDF
-
A survey of AI-generated voices and their detection
Abstract
The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate highly realistic human voices has advanced rapidly. These technologies power accessibility tools, virtual assistants and creative applications, but they also enable harmful uses, including impersonation, fraud and disinformation. Recent incidents of voice cloning scams targeting businesses and political leaders underscore the urgent need for robust safeguards. Unlike image and video deepfakes, the detection of synthetic voices poses unique challenges due to the complexity of phonetics, prosody and auditory perception. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of AI voice generation and detection methods, encompassing both the technical foundations and the latest state-of-the-art advances. This study also identifies key open challenges, benchmark resources and future directions to make this survey useful for future researchers.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15411
PDF
-
Beyond Tokens: A Survey on Decoding Methods for Large Language and Vision-Language Models
2026-08-14 18:08:03Haoran Wang, Xiongxiao Xu, Philip S. Yu, Kai ShuAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive generative capabilities, yet ensuring their outputs align with user intent is still challenging. While most existing approaches address this issue at the training stage, inference-time approaches like decoding methods offer a more efficient and scalable solution. Decoding methods control model generation by guiding token-level selection, performing sequence-level generation, or generating tokens in parallel to accelerate the process. In this survey, we identify three emerging paradigms from recent works on decoding methods for LLMs and LVLMs, provide a systematic review of these methods, highlight ongoing challenges, and discuss potential future research directions. Our goal is to underscore the efficiency and effectiveness of decoding methods and offer a practical view of their applications. Paper lists and more resources on decoding methods for LLMs and LVLMs can be found at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14797
PDF
-
The Past and Future of AI Scientists
Abstract
We present a survey of the past and future of AI Scientists: machines capable of automating science. AI Scientists can originate hypotheses, deduce their consequences, design and execute experiments, interpret their results, and revise their beliefs. Such systems are integrated scientific agents, connected to the literature, formal knowledge, mathematical models, simulations, data-analysis systems and physical laboratories. Adam was the first machine to make novel scientific discoveries through cycles of hypothesis formation and physical experimentation. Eve established the architecture of the modern self-driving laboratory. Foundation models, autonomous agents and laboratory robotics now make it possible to build systems far more general than either Adam or Eve. The central problem is no longer whether individual components of science can be automated. They can. The problem is integration. AI Scientists must combine neural learning with logic, probability, mathematics, causal reasoning, simulation, experimental design, robotics and formal scientific records. AI Scientists have the potential to transform science: to make science faster, cheaper, more systematic and more reproducible. AI Scientists could investigate systems too complicated for unaided human science, and enable thousands of AI scientists to work together on single problems. The Nobel Turing Challenge sets the goal of developing by 2050 AI systems capable of automating Nobel-quality discoveries. Progress is ahead of schedule. When we succeed it will create a new form of science and transform the world.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14407
PDF
-
A Survey of Large Models in Sports
2026-08-14 15:17:54Yichen Xu, Jianzhe Ma, Chuhan Wang, Zhonghao Cao, Liangyu Chen, Wenxuan Wang, Qin JinAbstract
Sports have witnessed growing global enthusiasm in recent years, serving as a vital force for physical health, cultural exchange, social connection, and economic growth. The rapid advancement of large models, particularly (multimodal) large language models (M)LLMs, has demonstrated transformative potential to reshape sports understanding, analysis, and interaction across diverse domains. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of large models in sports, including (i) an overview of tasks and applications across different participant groups; (ii) a detailed analysis of sports-related datasets and benchmarks; and (iii) a critical discussion of current challenges and future directions. Our goal is to establish a foundation for advancing research and practical development of large-model-driven sports intelligence. An open-source GitHub repository is maintained at: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14377
PDF
-
The conditional superiority of fast silicon sampling
Abstract
Silicon sampling can produce surprisingly good population estimates at times. Does doing it fast attenuate such fidelity? In this study, we extend and assess ongoing work in silicon sampling by comparing the algorithmic fidelity of "fast" and "slow" modes of silicon sampling among a nationally representative sample of Singaporean survey respondents. We find that silicon sampling with contemporary frontier models remains a method in early development to be used only with great caution. While silicon samples are able to produce moderately faithful estimates of population means, they continue to understate opinion variance and distort the latent contextual space behind human opinions. Conditional on such limitations, we find "fast" modes of silicon sampling to be relatively superior to traditional "slow" modes of silicon sampling. Fast silicon sampling is significantly more efficient in compute resources and run-time while being monotonically superior to slower modes of sampling in algorithmic fidelity.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14079
PDF
-
Beyond Control Points: Arcsecond Relative-Motion Estimation of Vision Measurement Platforms With Incomplete or Absent Control Fields
2026-08-14 03:41:30Meng Lian, Jian Wang, Shuixin Pan, Haibo Liu, Yueqiang Zhang, Yulan GuoAbstract
Long-range vision-based deformation monitoring is highly sensitive to motion of the camera platform. Absolute-pose differencing typically relies on dedicated control data and propagates two independent pose errors into the relative-motion estimate. We develop a control-adaptive differential framework that estimates inter-frame platform motion directly from image displacements and known 3D points. With no dedicated control point, the framework recovers platform rotation from measurement-point observations. One surveyed control point enables prior-constrained translation recovery, while two nonparallel control rays recover full 3D translation. The framework requires neither nonlinear optimization nor an initial pose estimate. Excluding control data from the rotation stage makes the rotation estimate exactly immune to contamination confined to the control field. The inherited differential formulation also cancels translational extrinsic errors exactly. We derive the rotation observability condition, a leakage bound for unmodeled translation and nonrigid point motion, and the single-point axial-prior bias law. Under 0.5-pixel image noise, attitude changes of up to 30~arcmin, and 3D point perturbations of up to 2~mm, the multi-camera estimator achieves a rotation RMSE of 2.97~arcsec and an average runtime of 0.46~ms. With one surveyed control point, its prior-constrained translation RMSE is 1.19~mm. In a bridge experiment without a stable control field, the median coordinate-wise displacement RMSE relative to total-station measurements is 0.85~mm. The estimator also maintains zero divergence under the tested 3D coordinate perturbations on public RGB-D and stereo sequences. These results establish state-of-the-art accuracy, calibration robustness, and computational efficiency among the evaluated methods.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13918
PDF
-
Federated Prompt Learning: A Unified Framework, Empirical Analysis, and Future Directions
2026-08-14 00:25:24Qinglin Yang, Chen Qiu, Hongyuan Zhang, Pengdeng Li, Yuan Liu, Zhihong TianAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have become core components of cloud-based intelligent services in academia and industry, yet their training and deployment are hindered by high computational costs, data centralization, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) offers a decentralized training paradigm that enables clients to collaboratively train a learning model without sharing raw data, making it a promising solution for privacy-preserving LLM training and reasoning. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of federated prompt learning (FPL) to review recent advances in integrating the federated learning paradigm and large language models, answering the following research questions: RQ1: The fundamental motivations, characteristics, and enabling technologies of FPL, and how it differs from conventional FL and full-model federated fine-tuning; RQ2: The trade-offs FPL approaches exhibit in performance, communication efficiency, computational overhead, scalability, personalization, and heterogeneity handling; RQ3: The remaining security, privacy, robustness, and system challenges, along with key future research directions. To this end, we systematically examine existing FPL methods across the full model lifecycle: pre-training, fine-tuning, and practical applications, while discussing security, privacy, and robustness issues and summarizing existing defense mechanisms. Finally, we highlight open challenges and future directions, aiming to help readers understand how the insights drive research in FPL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13844
PDF
-
Data-driven techniques for translational neuroscience and personalized neuro-health
2026-08-13 20:11:09Vishal Subedi, Shashipraba N. K. Rajakaruna, Pratyusha Sarkar, Subhankar Chattoraj, Anjali Khasa, Siddhartha Nandy, Hamza Farooq, Animikh Biswas, Sanjay Chaudhuri, Asim K. Dey, Karuna Joshi, Christophe Lenglet, Ansu ChatterjeeAbstract
Neurodegenexrative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease are diagnosed most reliably only after substantial, often irreversible, neuronal loss has already occurred, creating an urgent need for quantitative tools that can detect subtle, early, and individual-specific brain changes from neuroimaging data. This review surveys a broad and rapidly evolving toolkit of data-driven techniques for translational neuroscience and personalized neuro-health, organized around four complementary methodological pillars. Throughout, we emphasize how these methodologically diverse approaches converge on a common translational goal: personalized, mechanistically grounded, and clinically actionable models of individual brain health, and we close by discussing the principal open statistical, computational, and clinical challenges that remain.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13749
PDF
-
Numeracy in Large Language Models: Fundamental Limitations and Paths to Improvement
2026-08-13 12:01:58Aoxin NiAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks yet remain unreliable on elementary numerical tasks, including magnitude comparison, large-integer arithmetic, fractions, and scientific notation. This survey examines basic numerical understanding as a capability distinct from high-level mathematical reasoning. We propose the Numerical Grounding Framework (NGF), which decomposes numeracy into Representational Grounding (RG), mapping numeral forms to value, magnitude, and equivalent representations, and Procedural Grounding (PG), executing arithmetic operations in accordance with their mathematical definitions. Using NGF, we organize recent diagnostic benchmarks, failure modes, structural explanations, and mitigation strategies. We review evidence concerning tokenization, positional encoding, embedding geometry, and pretraining-data distribution. We also apply NGF in a coordinated evaluation of three frontier model families across Number Cookbook, NumericBench, and GSM-Symbolic, comparing atomic, contextual, and reasoning-assisted numeracy. Architectural interventions such as digit-aware tokenization and Abacus Embeddings can improve models trained from scratch but are generally unavailable to users of pretrained systems, for whom supervised fine-tuning, reasoning scaffolds, and external tools are more practical. We conclude with deployment recommendations and research directions for more reliable numerical behavior in foundation models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13129
PDF
-
IP Protection in the Era of Visual Generative AI: A Survey
2026-08-13 00:26:41Zhuan Shi, Shunchang Liu, Alireza Dehghanpour Farashah, Qian Yang, Han Yu, Cao Yang, Chaochao Chen, Yuping Yan, Yaochu Jin, Golnoosh Farnadi, Lingjuan LyuAbstract
The rapid evolution of visual generative AI has introduced a wide range of intellectual property risks, spanning the unauthorized learning, reproduction, extraction, misuse, and redistribution of protected data and model assets. To address these risks, a growing body of technical defenses has been proposed. However, existing surveys typically organize this literature by lifecycle stage or technical mechanism, which can obscure the protective intent of different methods. This survey presents a two-dimensional taxonomy for IP protection in visual generative models. The primary axis is a Control Logic View, which classifies methods into Information Exposure Control, Generative Behavior Constraint, and Attribution & Accountability according to the risk variable they regulate. The secondary axis distinguishes Data IP from Model IP as cross-cutting asset dimensions. Under this framework, we systematically review protection methods, align evaluation protocols with protection objectives, and discuss open challenges including proactive model-level safeguards, standardized evaluation, robustness against adaptive attacks, and explainable evidence. This survey aims to offer a principled, systematic, and easy-to-follow overview for both new and experienced researchers in visual generative AI IP protection.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14730
PDF
-
Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
2026-08-12 15:27:45\'I\~nigo de Troya, Maurus Enbergs, Neelke Doorn, Roel DobbeAbstract
Algorithm registers have been championed as a means of providing transparency on the use of algorithms in public services. Yet potential publics differ in their expectations of what should be made transparent and how, as well as in their interest in and ability to parse the information currently published in the registers. Moreover, it remains unclear how these instruments can represent the sociotechnical systems in which these algorithms are embedded, and how system-level transparency can facilitate accountability. In this paper, we ask, what do algorithm registers reveal (and occlude) about the sociotechnical systems governing algorithmic systems, and how can diverse stakeholder perspectives inform a more pluralistic system-theoretic safety analysis? To do this, we probe the municipal algorithm register of a Dutch city through a case study of a decision-support tool for caseworkers' assessment of citizens' welfare benefits eligibility based on legal automation through a business rule engine. Through interviews, surveys, and participatory system mapping workshops (with municipal staff, civil society organisations, and ombudsmen, N=8), we seek to understand to what extent the register allows stakeholders to map the algorithmic system in question. These maps inform a System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) that situates the register within a wider sociotechnical governance structure. Participants' contributions allow us to identify potential safety hazards which would not have been possible to see using the algorithm register alone, including benefits eligibility denial, system performance deterioration, and inability to contest wrongful decisions. By engaging both direct and indirect stakeholders, we reflect on the normative dimensions of algorithm governance efforts and how politics shape the practice of system safety analysis.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12166
PDF
-
Benchmark-Based Comparative Assessment of Publicly Benchmarked Indian Foundation Models: A Capability and Evaluation-Maturity Framework
2026-08-12 10:19:14Avinash Agarwal, Vridhi JainAbstract
Governments increasingly fund indigenous foundation models to strengthen national AI capability, digital sovereignty, and multilingual computing. Assessing the progress of such national ecosystems is complicated by inconsistent benchmark reporting, proprietary evaluation methodologies, and rapidly evolving model releases. This paper presents a structured, benchmark-based comparative assessment of publicly benchmarked Indian foundation models against global frontier and comparable-scale models, across eight capability domains: general-purpose reasoning, coding and software engineering, agentic AI and computer use, cybersecurity, vision and image understanding, video and multimodal understanding, scientific research, and Indic language capability. Using only publicly reported benchmark results, we find that Indian models achieve strong scores on established benchmarks such as MMLU and MATH-500. However, these benchmarks are now widely regarded as saturated, and frontier developers no longer report them. Indian models participate far less frequently in newer, agentic, and domain-specialized evaluations. Benchmark participation is also highly uneven across Indian organizations. Among the models surveyed, Sarvam AI reports the broadest benchmark coverage by a substantial margin. We propose an exploratory four-dimension Benchmark Maturity Index (BMI), scoring each capability domain on standardization, participation, independent verification, and national coverage. We show that the BMI refines, and in some cases revises, the maturity judgments that a purely descriptive review would produce. We argue that many apparent capability gaps in the public record cannot be distinguished, on available evidence, from evaluation-ecosystem gaps. This has direct implications for how national AI programs should design monitoring and funding criteria.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11891
PDF
-
Inverse Theory of Mind Modeling for Content Recommendation: From Web Browsing to Dynamic Intelligent Interfaces
2026-08-11 18:58:28Mengyu Chen, Feiyu Lu, Chun-Fu Chen, Lucas Vinh Tran, Jay KatukuriAbstract
Modern recommender systems treat observed actions as reliable proxies for user preferences, yet interactions often reflect exploration or comparison rather than stable preference expression. As interfaces evolve from static layouts toward generative UIs and immersive extended reality (XR), the need for deeper, modality-agnostic user understanding grows: these adaptive environments must decide not only what to present but where, when, how prominently, and most importantly why a user acts. We propose an Inverse Theory of Mind (IToM) pipeline that reasons backward from observed interactions to infer the beliefs, preferences, and decision-making traits that explain behavior. The pipeline reconstructs each user's decision context, including what was chosen and what alternatives were available, applies LLM-driven counterfactual reasoning to produce evidence-grounded natural-language belief statements, and synthesizes these beliefs through multi-hypothesis abductive inference into a structured user persona. We evaluate on the OPeRA dataset against ground-truth personality assessments, attitudinal surveys, and interview-based personas across four tasks: next action prediction, shopping attitude alignment, Big Five personality inference, and held-out category prediction. Results show that inferred personas match or exceed ground-truth personas and that multi-hypothesis reasoning is essential for accurate personality prediction. We further demonstrate cross-modal transferability with a persona-driven spatial banking application on VisionOS.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11354
PDF
-
Apodex Discovery: Reality Benchmarks and Environments for Evaluating and Building Discoverative Artificial Intelligence
2026-08-11 18:48:40Brian Wang, Bin Feng, Xiaoman Pan, Chenyang An, Felix Liu, Tangqi Fang, Gongbo Sun, Lingfeng Shen, Ning Wang, Handuo Zhang, Feng Chen, Fuchao Yang, Xiang Wang, Jiacheng Lin, Siting Li, Zixuan Liu, Chi Han, Zhenhailong Wang, Kunlun Zhu, Lawrence Zhao, Yueqi Guo, Kailong Wen, Feng Xing, Yiling Guo, Lidong Bing, David Tan, Bo An, Heng Ji, Sheng WangAbstract
Apollo did not reach the Moon merely because its engineers could solve difficult equations. It succeeded by turning a distant ambition into a mission architecture of explicit objectives, simulation, verification, and repeated correction. AI now faces a similar transition: frontier models can solve difficult tasks once the problem, tools, and success criteria are specified, yet consequential real-world challenges rarely arrive in an executable or verifiable form. We introduce Apodex Discovery, a framework for building and evaluating discoverative AI through the heavy-duty solver, a system comprising a foundation model, harness, tools, and control policies that pursues extended, stateful, verifiable investigations. It has three core components. First, a problem-scouting process surveyed 561 industries across 16 sectors, assembled 423 high-value real-world problems, and selected 20 for the initial release. Second, a common environment-task-episode abstraction provides data, tools, constraints, feedback, trajectory recording, and verification of intermediate artifacts and final submissions. Third, HDS6 evaluates Tools, Repair, Alternatives, Coherence, Evidence, and Scope independently of final-task success. In AAV capsid design, Apodex surpassed the published state of the art by 7% across viability, tropism, structure prediction, and generative design. In drug repurposing and reformulation, a task-specific biomedical environment improved the mean normalized prediction score of GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6-sol by 2.5 and 7.6 points over the same closed-book backbone. Controlled ablations show that the fixed TRACES episode interface enables attribution of performance differences to specific solver components. Apodex Discovery moves AI evaluation beyond predefined benchmarks toward verifiable investigations aimed at genuine discovery.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11341
PDF
-
Cross-View Feature Matching: Survey, Benchmarking, and Foundation-Model Perspectives
2026-08-11 16:00:40Songlin Du, Xiaoyong Lu, Zeyu Wu, Xiaobo Lu, Guobao Xiao, Bin Fan, Jiayi Ma, Takeshi IkenagaAbstract
Cross-view feature matching aims to establish reliable correspondences across images with large viewpoint variations. Over the past decade, the field has evolved from task-specific models toward increasingly unified and generalizable correspondence models, with recent progress further driven by the emergence of vision foundation models (VFMs). Despite these advances, existing studies remain highly diverse in their problem formulations, model architectures, training paradigms, and evaluation protocols, making it difficult to obtain a unified understanding of the field. In this survey, we present a unified review of cross-view feature matching. We first introduce a structured taxonomy covering feature extraction, single-type feature matcher, multi-type feature matcher, VFMs based methods, training strategy and robust estimation, providing a coherent framework for analysis and comparison. We further examine recent advances, distilling key design principles and highlighting the shift toward unified and generalizable correspondence models. We also provide a unified experimental benchmarking of representative state-of-the-art methods under consistent protocols, enabling fair and comprehensive performance comparisons. In addition, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including efficiency, robustness under extreme conditions, and cross-domain generalization. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive and structured reference for understanding the evolution, current landscape, and future development of cross-view feature matching in the era of vision foundation models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11093
PDF
-
Templated or fully Synthetic? Prompt construction as a confound in measuring LLM political stance beyond writing assistance
Abstract
Political stance detection in LLMs has long been dominated by closed-ended, multiple-choice political survey questions---originally designed for humans, and thus lacks the realism and nuance of human-AI interactions in the wild, while also being susceptible to sandbagging. The recent IssueBench framework substantially mitigates these limitations with templated prompts anchored in real-world chat logs. Given the rise in non-work-related use of GenAI assistants, we extend IssueBench beyond writing assistance to include two additional tasks, information seeking and opinion sharing. We argue that templated prompts still lack the nuance of real ones, especially for open-ended tasks, and remain recognisable as evaluation artefacts. We propose the use of fully synthetic (LLM-generated) prompts, produced under detailed instructions with real prompts as seeds. We assess the ecological validity of real, templated, and LLM-generated prompts in a small-scale study covering 3 highly contested policy issues and 3 recent geopolitical conflicts. Human and LLM annotators rank LLM-generated prompts as no less realistic than real ones and clearly more realistic than templated ones, and find that they carry their intended intent and stance more clearly; the LLMs separate templated prompts from the other two far more sharply than the humans do. In a case study, templated and LLM-generated prompts yield systematically different stance estimates for the same model, most visibly under neutral framings, where templated prompts overstate the model's leaning in the direction encoded by the topic-and-stance text (filler) slotted into their templates.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11008
PDF
-
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
2026-08-11 08:01:05Albus W. Ng, Yi Han, Jusheng Zhang, Wenhao WangAbstract
The dominant paradigm treats AI safety as a property to be instilled during model training via RLHF, DPO, or Constitutional AI. We argue this is structurally insufficient for autonomous agents that execute code, mutate files, send messages, and modify databases. Agent safety should be a runtime contract enforced by the harness, and the contract has two complementary faces. The preventive face blocks dangerous actions before they happen via sandboxes, permission gates, output filters, and trajectory monitors. The evidential face requires verifiable proof that good actions actually happened, gating task submission on hard evidence such as test runs, log captures, file diffs, and citation grounding. We ground the position in four lines of public evidence, with row-level protocols and data released in the supplementary JSON files: a survey of 52 documented AI-agent and LLM safety incidents, a false-completion audit with 31 non-contested core cases plus one disputed illustrative case, a trajectory-schema audit of 12 public agent systems and harnesses, and a title-level audit of all 28,560 papers accepted at NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR 2023-2025 showing a pooled 8-12x imbalance between training-time and deployment-time publication. Two prior communities that needed to enforce safety, computer security and the experimental sciences, converged on runtime contracts with both preventive and evidential elements; agentic AI is now under the same pressure. We formalize an Agent Trajectory Schema and Evidence Chain, state a compositional gating proposition based on standard monitor composition, and outline a research agenda. The right unit of safety in agentic AI is the trajectory-with-checkable-evidence, not the model.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11274
PDF
-
What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research
2026-08-11 03:29:48Wesley Hanwen Deng, Agathe Balayn, Andrew Selbst, Jason I. Hong, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth Holstein, Hanna Wallach, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Solon BarocasAbstract
Responsible AI (RAI) has become a central concern for technology companies, regulators, and the public. How industry practitioners interpret, implement, and sustain RAI work directly shapes the design and deployment of AI systems. As empirical scholarship examining RAI practices in industry has rapidly expanded, findings are dispersed across studies that focus on different roles, organizational contexts, and interventions. This work synthesizes current knowledge through a literature review of 161 empirical studies spanning six years, each engaging industry practitioners via interviews, surveys, workshops, ethnographies, and other methods. Our synthesis reveals both meaningful progress and persistent challenges in industry RAI practice. Practitioner awareness has increased, RAI activities have become more professionalized, and interventions such as toolkits and guidelines are more widely adopted. At the same time, practitioners continue to face substantial barriers, including limited training, uneven organizational support, and a lack of interventions tailored to day-to-day work practices. By consolidating and organizing these findings, we provide a more complete account of industry RAI than any single study to date. We conclude by discussing implications for RAI researchers, practitioners seeking to adopt effective practices, and policymakers aiming to ground governance efforts in the realities of industry contexts.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10431
PDF
-
Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design
2026-08-10 23:10:40Qing Zong, Jiayu Liu, Junhao Shen, Zecong Tang, Linsi Wu, Yuxuan Liu, Rui Wang, Zhaowei Wang, Weiqi Wang, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Yangqiu SongAbstract
Agentic systems are increasingly expected to improve after deployment, yet single-entity self-evolution is often bounded by a static learning context, such as fixed tasks and feedback. This survey focuses on co-evolution in agentic systems, a multi-component form of self-evolution in which multiple agents and their environment impose adaptive pressure on one another. To organize existing papers, we propose a progressive three-stage taxonomy that traces how the system gradually sheds human-engineered constraints. Agent--Agent Co-Evolution studies how agents adapt through dynamic peers, including adversarial, collaborative, and organizational adaptation. Agent--Environment Co-Evolution extends this loop to adaptive tasks, feedback, and interaction spaces that change with the agents. Meta Co-Evolution further explores the possibility of making the evolution mechanism itself evolvable. We also discuss open challenges in evaluating such systems, scaling them across multiple components, and keeping increasingly autonomous evolutionary processes safe and controllable. This survey provides a unified foundation for building robust and open-ended agentic systems that can improve beyond fixed human-designed paths.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10299
PDF
